Investigating Older Adults' Use of a Socially Assistive Robot via Time Series Clustering and User Profiling: Descriptive Analysis Study
- PMID: 39298762
- PMCID: PMC11450348
- DOI: 10.2196/41093
Investigating Older Adults' Use of a Socially Assistive Robot via Time Series Clustering and User Profiling: Descriptive Analysis Study
Abstract
Background: The aging population and the shortage of geriatric care workers are major global concerns. Socially assistive robots (SARs) have the potential to address these issues, but developing SARs for various types of users is still in its infancy.
Objective: This study aims to examine the characteristics and use patterns of SARs.
Methods: This study analyzed log data from 64 older adults who used a SAR called Hyodol for 60 days to understand use patterns and their relationship with user characteristics. Data on user interactions, robot-assisted content use, demographics, physical and mental health, and lifestyle were collected. Time series clustering was used to group users based on use patterns, followed by profiling analysis to relate these patterns to user characteristics.
Results: Overall, 4 time series clusters were created based on use patterns: helpers, friends, short-term users, and long-term users. Time series and profiling analyses revealed distinct patterns for each group. We found that older adults use SARs differently based on factors beyond demographics and health. This study demonstrates a data-driven approach to understanding user needs, and the findings can help tailor SAR interventions for specific user groups.
Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the factors associated with the long-term use of SARs for geriatric care and makes methodological contributions.
Keywords: older adults; profiling analysis; robot use pattern; socially assistive robot; time series clustering.
©In-jin Yoo, Do-Hyung Park, Othelia EunKyoung Lee, Albert Park. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 19.09.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Rentsch S, Vitale CA, Zietlow K. Prioritizing geriatrics in medical education improves care for all. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2105549. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2105549. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/35899375 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- De Santis A, Siciliano B, De Luca A, Bicchi A. An atlas of physical human–robot interaction. Mech Mach Theory. 2008;43(3):253–270. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.003. - DOI
-
- Krakovski M, Kumar S, Givati S, Bardea M, Zafrani O, Nimrod G, Bar-Haim S, Edan Y. “Gymmy”: designing and testing a robot for physical and cognitive training of older adults. Appl Sci. 2021 Jul 12;11(14):6431. doi: 10.3390/app11146431. - DOI
-
- Mizuno J, Saito D, Sadohara K, Nihei M, Ohnaka S, Suzurikawa J, Inoue T. Effect of the information support robot on the daily activity of older people living alone in actual living environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2498. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052498. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph18052498 ijerph18052498 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous