Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2566.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6.

Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl

Affiliations

Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl

Maximilian Scholl et al. BMC Public Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease cause medical, social, and economic burdens worldwide. Disease management programs in Germany mostly lack components to improve patients' self-management and health-promoting lifestyles despite clear guideline recommendations. Therefore, a Personalized Self-Management Support Program (P-SUP) was developed, which includes: (1) peer support groups; (2) telephone coaching; (3) feedback reports and, (4) a web portal. This study aims to explore patients' and implementing stakeholders' experiences in the implementation of P-SUP to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using face-to-face focus group interviews with participating patients and telephone-based one-to-one expert interviews with implementing stakeholders, involved in the delivery of the intervention. The transcribed interview reports were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, and the contents were categorized according to Donabedian's Structure-Process-Outcome framework.

Results: A total of six themes among patients (N = 35) and five themes among implementing stakeholders (N = 32) represent the experiences. The patient themes were: (1) technical conditions, (2) indoor facilities, (3) group composition, (4) acceptance of digital components, (5) supervision and feedback and (6) impact on lifestyle behavior. The themes among the implementing stakeholders were: (1) multiprofessional approach, (2) human resources, (3) patient acceptance, (4) supervision and feedback and (5) impact on lifestyle behavior.

Conclusions: Multiprofessional interventions such as P-SUP appear to be valuable for patients and implementing stakeholders. Although infrastructural barriers made the implementation of peer support and digital patient education difficult, patients rated the exchange with peers and experts on health-related topics positively. The lack of supervision and feedback during the course of the intervention might be compensated by regular telephone coaching. The findings from this study can be used in future studies to guide researchers and implementing stakeholders and to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of complex interventions in different contexts.

Trial registration: The P-SUP study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 16/07/2020 under the registration number DRKS00020592.

Keywords: Complex intervention; Disease management program; Lifestyle modification; Peer support; Process evaluation; Type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Jacobs E, Hoyer A, Brinks R, Icks A, Kuß O, Rathmann W. Healthcare costs of type 2 diabetes in Germany. Diabet Med. 2017;34(6):855–61. - PubMed
    1. Schmid T. Costs of treating cardiovascular events in Germany: a systematic literature review. Health Econ Rev. 2015;5(1):27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of Chronic Disease in Primary Care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–75. - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing Care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511–44. - PubMed
    1. Miksch A, Trieschmann J, Ose D, Rölz A, Heiderhoff M, Szecsenyi J. [General practitioners’ opinion and attitude towards DMPs and the change in practice routines to implement the DMP diabetes mellitus type 2]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(6):427–33. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources