Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Sep 20;42(1):530.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05232-6.

Bicenter validation of a risk model for the preoperative prediction of extraprostatic extension of localized prostate cancer combining clinical and multiparametric MRI parameters

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Bicenter validation of a risk model for the preoperative prediction of extraprostatic extension of localized prostate cancer combining clinical and multiparametric MRI parameters

Nicola Edith von Ostau et al. World J Urol. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to validate a previously published risk model (RM) which combines clinical and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) parameters to predict extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PC) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP).

Materials and methods: A previously published RM combining clinical with mpMRI parameters including European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) classification for EPE was retrospectively evaluated in a cohort of two urological university hospitals in Germany. Consecutive patients (n = 205, January 2015 -June 2021) with available preoperative MRI images, clinical information including PSA, prostate volume, ESUR classification for EPE, histopathological results of MRI-fusion biopsy and RP specimen were included. Validation was performed by receiver operating characteristic analysis and calibration plots. The RM's performance was compared to ESUR criteria.

Results: Histopathological T3 stage was detected in 43% of the patients (n = 89); 45% at Essen and 42% at Düsseldorf. Discrimination performance between pT2 and pT3 of the RM in the entire cohort was AUC = 0.86 (AUC = 0.88 at site 1 and AUC = 0.85 at site 2). Calibration was good over the entire probability range. The discrimination performance of ESUR classification alone was comparable (AUC = 0.87).

Conclusions: The RM showed good discriminative performance to predict EPE for decision-making for RP as a patient-tailored risk stratification. However, when experienced MRI reading is available, standardized MRI reading with ESUR scoring is comparable regarding information outcome. A main limitation is the potentially limited transferability to other populations because of the high prevalence of EPE in our subgroups.

Keywords: Extraprostatic extension; Multiparametric MRI; Positive surgical margins; Prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nicola Edith von Ostau congress travel expenses Janssen-Cilag GmbH. Analena Elisa Handke no disclosures. Manuel Wiesenfarth no disclosures. Marc Ingenwerth no disclosures. Henning Reis Honoraria: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, MCI, CHOP GmbH, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Diaceutics; Advisory boards: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche; travel support: Philips, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb; funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb. Jan Philipp Radtke: Advisory Boards and Consulting for Astellas, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Saegeling Medizintechnik, Bender Gruppe, Dr Wolf, Beckelmann und Partner. Invited speaker for Apogepha, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Philips Invivo. Research Funding: AAA/Novartis, Medical Faculty Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, EAU Research Foundation. Boris Hadaschik: Advisory boards for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bayer, ABX, Lightpoint, Amgen, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis. Invited speaker for Accord, Astellas, Janssen R&D. Honoraria from Uromed. Research funding from AAA/Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and German Research Foundation. Leadership roles for DKG AUO and DGU. Lars Schimmöller no disclosures. Claudia Kesch: Consulting for Apogepha. Invited speaker for Novartis, and Pfizer.Travel support from Janssen R&D, Amgen and Bayer. Research funding from AAA/Novartis, Amgen and Mariana Oncology. All authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curve analysis of the EPE-RM (black curve) and ESUR (red curve) for the prediction of an EPE. A: Site 1 (Essen); B: Site 2 (Düsseldorf)

References

    1. Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan MW, Chen HN, Kuroiwa K, Eisenberg HF et al (2007) Prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. Radiology 242:182–188. 10.1148/RADIOL.2421051254 - PubMed
    1. Carver BS, Bianco FJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA (2006) Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy in men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. J Urol 176:564–568. 10.1016/J.JURO.2006.03.093 - PubMed
    1. Ward JF, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H (2005) Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome. BJU Int 95:751–756. 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2005.05394.X - PubMed
    1. McClure TD, Margolis DJA, Reiter RE, Sayre JW, Thomas MA, Nagarajan R et al (2012) Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Radiology 262:874–883. 10.1148/RADIOL.11103504 - PubMed
    1. Morlacco A, Sharma V, Viers BR, Rangel LJ, Carlson RE, Froemming AT et al (2017) The incremental role of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate Cancer staging before Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 71:701–704. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.015 - PubMed