Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 20;8(1):107.
doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00504-7.

Quality control of elbow joint radiography using a YOLOv8-based artificial intelligence technology

Affiliations

Quality control of elbow joint radiography using a YOLOv8-based artificial intelligence technology

Qi Lai et al. Eur Radiol Exp. .

Abstract

Background: To explore an artificial intelligence (AI) technology employing YOLOv8 for quality control (QC) on elbow joint radiographs.

Methods: From January 2022 to August 2023, 2643 consecutive elbow radiographs were collected and randomly assigned to the training, validation, and test sets in a 6:2:2 ratio. We proposed the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) models to identify target detection boxes and key points on elbow radiographs using YOLOv8. These identifications were transformed into five quality standards: (1) AP elbow positioning coordinates (XA and YA); (2) olecranon fossa positioning distance parameters (S17 and S27); (3) key points of joint space (Y3, Y4, Y5 and Y6); (4) LAT elbow positioning coordinates (X2 and Y2); and (5) flexion angle. Models were trained and validated using 2,120 radiographs. A test set of 523 radiographs was used for assessing the agreement between AI and physician and to evaluate clinical efficiency of models.

Results: The AP and LAT models demonstrated high precision, recall, and mean average precision for identifying boxes and points. AI and physicians showed high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in evaluating: AP coordinates XA (0.987) and YA (0.991); olecranon fossa parameters S17 (0.964) and S27 (0.951); key points Y3 (0.998), Y4 (0.997), Y5 (0.998) and Y6 (0.959); LAT coordinates X2 (0.994) and Y2 (0.986); and flexion angle (0.865). Compared to manual methods, using AI, QC time was reduced by 43% for AP images and 45% for LAT images (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: YOLOv8-based AI technology is feasible for QC of elbow radiography with high performance.

Relevance statement: This study proposed and validated a YOLOv8-based AI model for automated quality control in elbow radiography, obtaining high efficiency in clinical settings.

Key points: QC of elbow joint radiography is important for detecting diseases. Models based on YOLOv8 are proposed and perform well in image QC. Models offer objective and efficient solutions for QC in elbow joint radiographs.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Elbow joint; Quality control; Radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests in this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the model training, validation and test on the dataset. AP, Anteroposterior; LAT, Lateral
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Annotations of key points and auxiliary lines. a Anterioposterior view of the elbow joint. b Lateral view of the elbow joint. Auxiliary lines S17 and S27 in the anterioposterior view represent distances between points 1 and 7, and between points 2 and 7, respectively, along with the flexion angle α in the lateral view are shown
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The architecture of the YOLOv8 algorithm, which is divided into three parts, including backbone, neck, and head
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Visualization of the artificial intelligence (AI) models’ predictions and clinician’s annotation. The red key points and box are from the clinician’s annotations, and the blue key points and boxes are generated by the AI model. a Anterioposterior view, showing one target detection box and seven key points; b lateral view, showing one target detection box and three key points
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Scatter plots of correlations between AI predictions and clinician annotations in the test set. a ICC for XA and YA in AP view; b ICC for S17 and S27 in AP view; c ICC for Y3 and Y4 in AP view; d ICC for Y5 and Y6 in AP view; e ICC for X2 and Y2 in LAT view; f ICC for flexion angle α in LAT view. AP, Anteroposterior; ICC, Intraclass correlation coefficient; LAT Lateral
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
YOLOv8-QC GUI software and its application. a YOLOv8-QC GUI software. b QC results available to users. c Application of YOLOv8-QC GUI software. AP, Anteroposterior; LAT, Lateral; QC, Quality control; GUI, Graphical user interface

References

    1. Javed M, Mustafa S, Boyle S, Scott F (2015) Elbow pain: a guide to assessment and management in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 65:610–612. 10.3399/bjgp15X687625 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luceri F, Cucchi D, Rosagrata E et al (2021) Novel radiographic indexes for elbow stability assessment: part A—cadaveric validation. Indian J Orthop 55:336–346. 10.1007/s43465-021-00407-4 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheehan SE, Dyer GS, Sodickson AD, Patel KI, Khurana B (2013) Traumatic elbow injuries: what the orthopedic surgeon wants to know. Radiographics 33:869–888. 10.1148/rg.333125176 - PubMed
    1. Crosby NE, Greenberg JA (2014) Radiographic evaluation of the elbow. J Hand Surg Am 39:1408–1414. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.035 - PubMed
    1. Jones AK, Polman R, Willis CE, Shepard SJ (2011) One year’s results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography. J Digit Imaging 24:243–255. 10.1007/s10278-009-9236-2 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources