Empathy as a Mediator of the Relation between Peer Influence and Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39302609
- DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02079-3
Empathy as a Mediator of the Relation between Peer Influence and Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
During adolescence, empathy and prosocial behavior contribute to the establishment of positive interpersonal relationships and social connections, promoting holistic development in youth. A substantial amount of research has provided compelling evidence that there is a relationship between peer relationships and empathy and prosocial behavior. Empathy, as a key mediating factor, links the influence of peers with prosocial behavior in adolescents, yet there is currently a lack of robust meta-analytic evidence regarding this mediating role. This study employed a two-stage structural equation modeling approach to synthesize existing research on peer influence, empathy, and prosocial behavior during adolescence. Systematic searches were conducted across three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO), identifying a total of 49 studies, with a systematic assessment of study quality. The results indicated that empathy plays a mediating role between peer influence and prosocial behavior. Positive peer influence is positively correlated with empathy and prosocial behavior, while negative peer influence is negatively correlated with empathy and prosocial behavior, and empathy is positively correlated with prosocial behavior. This meta-analysis demonstrates that during adolescence, empathy mediates the connection between peer influence and prosocial behavior, representing a potential process that can explain the relationship between peer influence and prosocial behavior.
Keywords: Adolescent; Empathy; Meta-analytic structural equation modeling; Peer influence; Prosocial behavior.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with Ethical Standards. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
References (*Included in the meta-analysis)
-
- Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Proulx, J., Lok, I., & Norton, M. I. (2020). Does spending money on others promote happiness?: A registered replication report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), e15–e26. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000191 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alexander, J. M., Yesodharan, R., & Nayak, M. G. (2024). Peer influence and its impact on behavior among South Indian adolescents: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_697_23 .
-
- *Barry, C. M. & Wentzel, K. R. (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: The role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics.Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.153 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Batson, D. C. (2011). Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical