Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 1;39(1):e13-e19.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004953. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity

Affiliations

Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity

Filipa Cardoso et al. J Strength Cond Res. .

Abstract

Cardoso, F, Costa, MJ, Colaço, P, Vilas-Boas, JP, Pinho, JC, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ. Ventilatory and perceived ergogenic effects of mandibular forward repositioning during running at maximal oxygen uptake intensity. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): e13-e19, 2025-Wearing an intraoral dental splint may enhance ventilatory function and exercise performance. Nineteen runners performed on a 400-m outdoor track: (a) an incremental protocol to assess the velocity at maximal oxygen uptake (vV̇ o2 max) and (b) 2 square wave bouts wearing 2 intraoral splints (with and without mandibular forward repositioning). The time until exhaustion at vV̇ o2 max (TLimv V̇ o2 max), ventilatory variables, oxygen uptake (V̇ o2 ) kinetics, energetic profiling, perceived exertion and kinematics, were all measured. Ventilatory data were assessed breath-by-breath and perceived exertion evaluated using the Borg 6-20-point scale at the end of TLimv V̇ o2 max bouts. Images were recorded by video cameras (120 Hz) and kinematic measures retrieved using Kinovea. A paired t test was computed for comparison of splints ( p ≤ 0.05). With (vs. without) mandibular forward repositioning, runners increased their TLimv V̇ o2 max by ∼6% ( p = 0.03), coupled with higher ventilation (151 ± 22 vs. 147 ± 23 L·min -1 , p = 0.04), end-tidal oxygen tension (114.3 ± 3.7 vs. 112.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg, p = 0.003), and lower inspiratory time (0.526 ± 0.083 vs. 0.540 ± 0.090 seconds, p = 0.02), despite similar V̇ o2 kinetics (e.g., 49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 47.7 ± 8.6 ml∙kg∙min -1 of fast component amplitude) being observed. The energy expenditure was ∼8% higher ( p = 0.03) with the mandible forward, coupled with lower perceived exertion scores ( p = 0.04). Mandibular forward repositioning was effective in acutely improving running performance at vV̇ o2 max with ergogenic effects on ventilatory and perceived variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amann M. Pulmonary system limitations to endurance exercise performance in humans. Exp Physiol 97: 311–318, 2012.
    1. Bailey SJ, Romer LM, Kelly J, et al. Inspiratory muscle training enhances pulmonary O 2 uptake kinetics and high-intensity exercise tolerance in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 109: 457–468, 2010.
    1. Bassett DR Jr, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 70–84, 2000.
    1. Billat LV, Koralsztein JP. Significance of the velocity at VO 2 max and time to exhaustion at this velocity. Sports Med 22: 90–108, 1996.
    1. Billat V, Bernard O, Pinoteau J, Petit B, Koralsztein JP. Time to exhaustion at VO 2 max and lactate steady state velocity in sub elite long-distance runners. Arch Int Physiol Biochim Biophys 102: 215–219, 1994.

LinkOut - more resources