Unexpected transient atrioventricular block and slow junctional rhythm using pulsed field ablation for slow pathway modification: Excited or cautious for ablators
- PMID: 39304002
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.023
Unexpected transient atrioventricular block and slow junctional rhythm using pulsed field ablation for slow pathway modification: Excited or cautious for ablators
Abstract
Background: Data regarding the effects of pulsed field ablation (PFA) on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are limited.
Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the outcomes of PFA for AVNRT and its impact on dual-pathway electrophysiology.
Methods: A larger cohort of patients with typical AVNRT underwent slow pathway (SP) modification (SPM) using a focal PFA catheter in a biphasic/bipolar manner. The primary endpoints were the efficacy and safety of PFA during the procedure and at 6-month follow-up.
Results: The acute success of SPM was achieved in all 40 patients. The total ablation time was 7.9 ± 3.8 seconds for 6.4 ± 2.2 ablation sites (ASs). Slow junctional rhythm (SJR) was induced in 32 (80%) patients, lasting 28.9 ± 10.3 seconds in 3.0 ± 1.1 ASs per patient. SP was located 11.1 ± 1.2 mm from the largest His activation (LHA). At 9 ASs, SJR could be reinduced after an increase of contact force (CF) from 1.3 ± 0.5g to 6.4 ± 1.3 g (P < .0001). Transient atrioventricular block (AVB) was recorded in 7 (17.5%) patients (1 second-degree and 6 third-degree AVB) lasting 435.3 ± 227.4 seconds, with a shorter AS-LHA distance than patients without AVB (7.7 ± 0.6 mm vs. 11.3 ± 1 mm; P < .0001). PFA-related delayed atrial-His (n = 6) and His-atrial (n = 1) conduction preceded transient AVB with a constant His-ventricular interval. Normal PR interval was restored within 24 hours. All patients maintained sinus rhythm without any significant adverse events during 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion: Despite the high efficiency of PFA for SPM, the notable incidence of transient AVB warranted caution when applying it near the His bundle. SJR frequently occurred during SPM and was dependent on moderate CF.
Keywords: Atrioventricular block; Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; Contact force; Pulsed field ablation; Slow junctional rhythm.
Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures None of the authors and authors and MicroPort EP MedTech company have conflicts to declare
Similar articles
-
Role of electrograms recorded from mini electrodes in catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a retrospective study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04924-0. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025. PMID: 40610905 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative utility of omnipolar and bipolar electroanatomic mapping methods to detect and localize dual nodal substrate in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Oct;67(7):1579-1591. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01800-3. Epub 2024 Apr 18. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38634991 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety between radiofrequency ablation and types of cryoablation catheters for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A Network Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;47(3):353-364. doi: 10.1111/pace.14915. Epub 2024 Jan 11. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38212906
-
Voltage-Gradient Mapping-Guided Slow Pathway Ablation in Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul;48(7):782-789. doi: 10.1111/pace.15223. Epub 2025 Jun 15. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025. PMID: 40518701 Free PMC article.
-
Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9842-2. Epub 2013 Nov 29. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24293174
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous