Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 20;22(1):131.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01219-2.

A transformative solution to build effective, transparent, and resilient "fit-for-purpose" national health research ethics systems

Affiliations
Review

A transformative solution to build effective, transparent, and resilient "fit-for-purpose" national health research ethics systems

Manju Rani et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

The current research ethics review systems are composed of isolated institutional Research Ethics Committees (RECs) that develop their own standard operating procedures (SOPs), templates and so on, with low adoption of digital solutions to manage submission and review processes. This poses several challenges, such as delays, higher costs, and hindering multi-site research. We propose an online national research ethics platform that all RECs can use, with common review processes and documentation requirements following national policy. The system will scale up adoption of digital solutions to all RECs. It will reduce administrative burden and harmonize review procedures. It will also obviate the need for separate and isolated interventions such as national REC registries or clinical trial registries, as these can be generated as transactional outputs of the system. The harmonized procedures and possibility of single submission will facilitate multi-site research. Sharing of resources and expertise among RECs on the platform will enhance resilience. An e-EC system developed in India and a Regional Health research portal developed by the WHO South-East Asia office offer proof of concepts to demonstrate the feasibility of developing and using such systems. The proposed solution is ambitious but feasible. Developing the proposed system will be a vital cost-effective investment in national health infrastructure to strengthen the research ecosystem and accelerate delivery of improved healthcare innovations by reducing unnecessary delays in conducting research. To maximize benefits, concurrent efforts are needed to build researchers' capacity and enhance the quality and efficiency of human reviews of the research proposals by REC.

Keywords: Clinical trial register; Ethical review/standards; Ethics committees; Ethics review systems; Harmonization of research ethics review; Research ethics; Research participants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests. The opinions presented in this paper are solely attributed to authors and not to the organizations they work for.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration for the proposed centralized cloud-based digital research ethics review systems
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CReaTE software (software suite of five novel IT tools) of e-EC system

References

    1. Silberman G, Kahn KL. Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. Milbank Q. 2011;89:599–627. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glasziou PP, Sanders S, Hoffmann T. Waste in covid-19 research. BMJ. 2020;369: m1847. - PubMed
    1. Marzouk D, Sharawy I, Nakhla I, El Hodhod M, Gadallah H, El-Shalakany A, et al. Challenges during review of COVID-19 research proposals: experience of faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University Research Ethics Committee, Egypt. Front Med. 2021;8: 715796. 10.3389/fmed.2021.715796. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Center for Biotechnology Information, NIH. Home | ClinicalTrials.gov. 2024. https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Accessed 27 June 2024.
    1. Greene SM, Geiger AM. A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:784–90. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources