Temporomandibular Joint Discectomy in Patients With Disc Displacement: Assessment of Osteoarthritis at 10- and 30-Year Follow-Up
- PMID: 39305054
- DOI: 10.1111/joor.13854
Temporomandibular Joint Discectomy in Patients With Disc Displacement: Assessment of Osteoarthritis at 10- and 30-Year Follow-Up
Abstract
Background: Few ≥ 10-year follow-up studies of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discectomy without replacement in patients with disc displacement (DD) analyse the relationship between the surgery and osteoarthritis (OA) exist.
Objectives: To radiologically evaluate bony joint changes and OA development 10 and 30 years after TMJ discectomy as well as 30-year clinical outcome.
Methods: Twenty-two discectomy patients at the University of Oslo, Norway, with records confirming initial TMJ diagnosis and attendance of 10-year radiological follow-up were evaluated and eligible for 30-year follow-up. Primary variables: discectomy and CT-/CBCT-diagnosed OA at follow-ups. Secondary variables: perioperative TMJ diagnoses and remodelling at follow-up. Unoperated TMJs (Unop-TMJs) in unilaterally operated patients were controls. Statistical association and correlation analyses were performed for the 10-year follow-up (significance level p < 0.05).
Results: Twenty-two patients attended the 10-year follow-up (mean follow-up 11 years) with 27 operated TMJs (Op-TMJs) and 17 Unop-TMJs. OA perioperatively was associated with DD without reduction (p = 0.001) and additional disc abnormalities (p = 0.016). Although statistically non-significant, the number of TMJs with OA had increased at 10-year follow-up (p = 0.114, Op-TMJs: 14 to 20 joints; Unop-TMJs: 2 to 5 joints). Remodelling was correlated with discectomy (p = 0.003) and to OA (p = 0.006). Nine patients attended the 30-year follow-up (mean follow-up 32 years, 11 Op-TMJs). All TMJs with OA at 30-year follow-up had OA at 10-year follow-up. Mean maximal interincisal opening was 39 mm. No DC-TMD-diagnosed arthralgia was found.
Conclusion: Osteoarthritis developed similarly between Op- and Unop-TMJs. Only remodelling, not OA, was correlated to the surgery. The clinical results were still favourable at final follow-up.
Keywords: DC‐TMD; discectomy; follow‐up; osteoarthritis; radiography; temporomandibular joint.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- G. Agerberg and M. Lundberg, “Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint After Surgical Treatment. A Radiologic Follow‐Up Study,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 32, no. 6 (1971): 865–875, https://doi.org/10.1016/0030‐4220(71)90171‐x.
-
- L. Eriksson and P. L. Westesson, “Long‐Term Evaluation of Meniscectomy of the Temporomandibular Joint,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 43, no. 4 (1985): 263–269, https://doi.org/10.1016/0278‐2391(85)90284‐8.
-
- C. M. Silver, “Long‐Term Results of Meniscectomy of the Temporomandibular Joint,” Cranio 3, no. 1 (1984): 46–57, https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1984.11678085.
-
- M. Tolvanen, V. J. Oikarinen, and J. Wolf, “A 30‐Year Follow‐Up Study of Temporomandibular Joint Meniscectomies: A Report on Five Patients,” British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 26, no. 4 (1988): 311–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/0266‐4356(88)90049‐6.
-
- S. Takaku and T. Toyoda, “Long‐Term Evaluation of Discectomy of the Temporomandibular Joint,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52, no. 7 (1994): 722–726; discussion 727–728, https://doi.org/10.1016/0278‐2391(94)90486‐3.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous