Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;33(6):1975-1981.
doi: 10.1002/ksa.12481. Epub 2024 Sep 22.

High accuracy in lower limb alignment analysis using convolutional neural networks, with improvements needed for joint-level metrics

Affiliations

High accuracy in lower limb alignment analysis using convolutional neural networks, with improvements needed for joint-level metrics

Christof Hoffmann et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of long-leg standing radiographs (LSR) is a standardised procedure for analysis of primary or secondary deformities of the lower limbs. Deep-learning convolutional neural networks (CNN) offer the potential to enhance radiological measurement by increasing reproducibility and accuracy. This study aims to evaluate the measurement accuracy of an automated CNN-based planning tool (mediCAD® 7.0; mediCAD Hectec GmbH) of lower limb deformities.

Methods: In a retrospective single-centre study, 164 pre- and postoperative bilateral LSRs with uni- or bilateral posttraumatic knee arthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enroled. Alignment parameters relevant to knee arthroplasty and deformity correction were analysed independently by two observers and a CNN. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the accuracy between observers and the CNN, which was further evaluated using absolute deviations, limits of agreement (LoA) and root mean square error (RMSE).

Results: CNN evaluation demonstrated high consistency in measuring leg length (ICC > 0.99) and overall lower limb alignment measures of mechanical tibio-femoral angle (mTFA) (ICC > 0.97; RMSE < 1.1°). The mean absolute difference between angular measurements were low for overall lower limb alignment (mTFA 0.49-0.61°) and high for specific joint angles (aMPFA 3.86-4.50°). Accuracy at specific joint angles like the mechanical proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA) varied between lower limbs with deformity, with and without TKA with greatest difference for TKA (ICC 0.22-0.85; RMSE 1.72-3.65°).

Conclusion: Excellent accuracy was observed between manual and automated measurements for overall alignment and leg length, but joint-level metrics need further improvement especially in case of TKA similar to other existing algorithms. Despite the observed deviations, the time-efficient nature of the algorithm improves the efficiency of the preoperative planning process.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Keywords: deep learning convolutional neural network; leg deformity; long leg standing radiographs; osteotomy; total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Steffen Schröter and Julian Fürmetz were expert members of the AO deformity correction planning task force collaborating with mediCAD®. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Automated CNN‐based measurements postoperatively after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Landmarks close to the knee joint demonstrate deviations to the software recommendations. JLCA, joint‐line convergence angle; mLDFA, mechanical lateral distal femur angle; mMPTA, mechanical medial proximal tibia angle; mTFA, measurements are displayed here for mechanical tibio‐femoral angle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland–Altman plots of manual versus automatic measurement of mTFA, mLDFA, and mMPTA including all LSRs (OA preoperatively [pre‐OA] and TKA postoperatively [post‐TKA] and unaffected knees [unaffected]). The limits of agreement (LoA) are defined within a range of ±degrees (green line) from the mean difference between manual and automatic measurement (red line).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babazadeh, S. , Dowsey, M.M. , Bingham, R.J. , Ek, E.T. , Stoney, J.D. & Choong, P.F.M. (2013) The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer‐assisted navigation and computer tomography. The Knee, 20(4), 242–249. Available from: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.07.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1996) Statistics notes: measurement error. BMJ, 312(7047), 1654. Available from: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1654 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowman, A. , Shunmugam, M. , Watts, A.R. , Bramwell, D.C. , Wilson, C. & Krishnan, J. (2016) Inter‐observer and intra‐observer reliability of mechanical axis alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty using long leg radiographs. The Knee, 23(2), 203–208. Available from: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.11.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braun, S. , Brenneis, M. , Holder, J. , Meurer, A. & Stief, F. (2023) Intra‐ and interobserver reliability analysis of pediatric lower limb parameters on digital long leg radiographs. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1), 69. Available from: 10.1186/s13018-023-03552-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunner, J. , Jörgens, M. , Weigert, M. , Kümpel, H. , Degen, N. & Fuermetz, J. (2023) Significant changes in lower limb alignment due to flexion and rotation‐a systematic 3D simulation of radiographic measurements. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31(4), 1483–1490. Available from: 10.1007/s00167-022-07302-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources