Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 22;32(3):200862.
doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200862. eCollection 2024 Sep 19.

TYRP1 directed CAR T cells control tumor progression in preclinical melanoma models

Affiliations

TYRP1 directed CAR T cells control tumor progression in preclinical melanoma models

Christopher S Hackett et al. Mol Ther Oncol. .

Abstract

Despite therapeutic efficacy observed with immune checkpoint blockade in advanced melanoma, many tumors do not respond to treatment, representing a need for new therapies. Here, we have generated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting TYRP1, a melanoma differentiation antigen expressed on the surface of melanomas, including rare acral and uveal melanomas. TYRP1-targeted CAR T cells demonstrate antigen-specific activation and cytotoxic activity in vitro and in vivo against human melanomas independent of the MHC alleles and expression. In addition, the toxicity to pigmented normal tissues observed with T lymphocytes expressing TYRP1-targeted TCRs was not observed with TYRP1-targeted CAR T cells. Anti-TYRP1 CAR T cells provide a novel means to target advanced melanomas, serving as a platform for the development of similar novel therapeutic agents and as a tool to interrogate the immunobiology of melanomas.

Keywords: MT: Regular Issue; acral; adoptive cellular therapy; chimeric antigen receptor; melanoma; ocular toxicity; uveal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.S.H., D.H., T.J.P., S.R., J.D.W., T.M., and R.J.B. are inventors on multiple patents filed by MSK covering CAR T cell technology, including the CAR T cells discussed in this manuscript. S.R. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Celyad Oncology. R.J.B. has licensed intellectual property to and collects royalties from BMS, Caribou, and Sanofi. R.J.B. received research funding from BMS. R.J.B. is a consultant to BMS, Atara Biotherapeutics Inc., and Triumvira, and was a consultant for Cargo Tx and CoImmune but ended in the past 3 months, and Gracell Biotechnologies Inc. but ended employment in the past 24 months. R.J.B. is a member of the scientific advisory board for Triumvira and was a member of the scientific advisory board for Cargo Tx and CoImmune, but that ended in the past 6 months. J.D.W. is a consultant for Apricity, Ascentage Pharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bicara Therapeutics (ending 4/1/2024), Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Dragonfly, Imvaq, Larkspur, Psioxus, Recepta, Takeda, Tizona, Trishula Therapeutics, and Sellas. J.D.W. received grant/research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Enterome. J.D.W. has equity in Apricity, Arsenal IO/CellCarta, Ascentage, Imvaq, Linneaus, Larkspur, Georgiamune, Maverick, Tizona Therapeutics, and Xenimmune. J.D.W. is an inventor on the following patents: Xenogeneic DNA Vaccines, Newcastle Disease viruses for Cancer Therapy, Myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) assay, Prediction of responsiveness to treatment with immunomodulatory therapeutics and method of monitoring abscopal effects during such treatment, Anti-PD1 Antibody, Anti-CTLA4 antibodies, Anti-GITR antibodies and methods of use thereof. T.M. is a consultant for Immunos Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo Co, TigaTX, Normunity, and Pfizer. T.M. is a cofounder of and equity holder in Imvaq Therapeutics. T.M. receives research grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Surface Oncology, Kyn Therapeutics, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Leap Therapeutics, and Aprea Therapeutics. T.M. is an inventor on patent applications related to work on oncolytic viral therapy, alpha virus-based vaccine, neo-antigen modeling, CD40, GITR, OX40, PD-1, and CTLA-4.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of TYRP1 mRNA expression in tumors (A) TYRP1 RNA-seq expression in 17 TCGA cohorts (n = 13,325 samples) and Zhang C. et al. data (n = 57 samples), grouped by cancer type, sorted by median expression. Bolded groups represent melanoma subtypes. The dashed red line depicts the mean expression in the TCGA cohort. Abbreviations are explained in Table S1. (B) TYRP1 log2 TPM RNA-seq expression in the CCLE, grouped by cell line disease and sorted by median expression. Bolded groups represent melanoma subtypes. Abbreviations are explained in Table S2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis of TYRP1 mRNA expression in normal tissues and in comparison with melanomas (A) TYRP1 expression in GTEx is shown grouped by detailed tissue type (SMTSD). Expression was measured by RNA-seq and log2 and TPM normalized. The tissue groups are ordered by median expression. (B) The density of TYRP1 RNA-seq expression in melanomas in the TCGA and Zhang et al. ACMFD tumor tissues (log2 TPM normalized). The dashed red line depicts the threshold used to separate samples into high and low expressers of TYRP1. (C) TYRP1 RNA-seq expression (log2 TPM normalized) was compared between melanoma tumor tissues and normal tissues. Three melanoma cohorts from TCGA and Zhang C. et al. were divided into high and low TYRP1 expression using log2 TPM of 5 (left, in red), and plotted with the 12 top TYRP1-expressing normal tissues grouped by detailed tissue type (SMTSD) from GTEx (right, in blue), sorted by median expression. The dashed red line depicts the mean expression of TYRP1 in all TCGA cohorts.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IHC for TYRP1 on mouse normal tissues Representative tissues from whole-mouse necropsy were stained for TYRP1. Representative images from positive tissues are shown. Cells staining brown are immunoreactive against the anti-TYRP1 antibody EPR13063. Cells were additionally stained with hematoxylin. Scale bars represent 20 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Human TA99-CAR T cells have efficacy against human melanomas in vitro (A) Schematic of TA99-CAR harboring a TYRP1 scFv binder based on the murine anti-TYRP1 TA99 antibody, CD28 transmembrane and costimulatory domain, and CD3zeta activation domain in an SFG gamma retroviral vector. (B) Human CAR T cells were co-cultured with TYRP1+ SK-MEL-19 and SK-MEL-188 melanoma cells expressing firefly luciferase at varying effector:T cell ratios and cytotoxicity was assessed using bioluminescence after 24 h. TA99-CAR T cells demonstrated superior antitumor efficacy compared with ovarian-targeted 4H11-CAR and anti-CD19 CAR T cells. (C) Human CAR T cells were co-cultured with CD19+, TYRP1 Nalm6 leukemia cells and TYRP1low SK-MEL-28 human melanoma cells. TA99-CAR T cells showed minimal cytotoxicity compared with the CD1-CAR controls in Nalm6 cells, and no CAR T cells demonstrated cytotoxicity against the SK-MEL-28. For (B) and (C), ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, ∗∗∗p < 0.0005, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.00005 by unpaired t test adjusted for multiple comparisons. NS = not significant. Means (SDs) are plotted. (D) Cytokine levels of TA99-CAR T cells cultured alone or with various CHO cell lines, demonstrating that CAR T cells only released cytokines in response to CHO cells expressing TYRP1. MT = mock transduced, TYRP1 tr = exogenous expression of truncated (membrane localized) TYRP1. (E) Cytokine levels of various CAR T cells co-cultured with TYRP1+ SK-MEL-19 melanoma cells, demonstrating that TA99-CAR T cells showed increased cytokine release compared with CAR T cells targeted to non-melanoma antigens.
Figure 5
Figure 5
TA99-CAR T cells have efficacy against human melanomas in vivo (A) Schematic of in vivo experiments. Two million SK-MEL-19 melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously. After 10 days of engraftment, CAR T cells were injected (5 million, with the exception of 0.5 million for one cohort of TA99-CAR T cells). Tumor growth was assessed weekly using bioluminescence and caliper measurements. Image created with the assistance of BioRender.com. (B) Tumor growth of mice treated with various CAR T cells (note that one mouse in the 0.5M TA99 CAR T cell cohort died of unknown causes during week 2 and was excluded from analysis). ∗∗p = 0.000561 at day 45 by unpaired t test. All mice who received human CAR T cells developed xenogeneic graft vs. host disease (xGvHD); mice were euthanized when clinically indicated per our IACUC protocol and analysis of the cohort was stopped when the first mouse developed xGvHD. (C) Quantitation of the bioluminescence signal from mice in (B). (D) TYRP1 was assessed by IHC in residual tumor tissue from the mice treated in Figures S4B and S4C. Scale bars represent 50 μm. For (B) and (C), means (SEMs) are plotted.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Histological analysis of eye tissue from CAR T cell-treated mice (A–D) Hematoxylin-eosin staining of cross sections of eyes from mice treated with either TA99-CAR T cells (A and C) or off-target 4H11-CAR T cells (B and D) (from Figure S4B) at various magnifications. Note that retinal separation was an artifact of tissue fixation. Scale bars represent 100 μm (A and B) or 20 μm (C and D). (E) IHC for TYRP1 on cross sections from mice treated with TA99-CAR T cells or off-target 4H11-CAR T cells, showing a loss of TYRP1+ cells in the uvea/choroid of mice treated with the TA99 CAR relative to the 4H11 controls. Scale bars represent 500 μm (left), 100 μm (center), and 20 μm (right).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Loss of TYRP1+ cells in normal tissues of mic treated with TA99 CAR T cells Tissues from mice from cohorts shown in Figure S4B were collected and stained for TYRP1 using IHC. We noted reduced levels of TYRP1+ cells in thymus, skin, and meninges in mice that received TA99 CAR T cells. Note that the 4H11 cohort are from the same source as images from Figure 3, shown again for comparison. Scale bars represent 20 μm.

References

    1. Wolchok J.D., Chiarion-Sileni V., Gonzalez R., Rutkowski P., Grob J.J., Cowey C.L., Lao C.D., Wagstaff J., Schadendorf D., Ferrucci P.F., et al. Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1345–1356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarnaik A.A., Hamid O., Khushalani N.I., Lewis K.D., Medina T., Kluger H.M., Thomas S.S., Domingo-Musibay E., Pavlick A.C., Whitman E.D., et al. Lifileucel, a Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy, in Metastatic Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021;39:2656–2666. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00612. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goff S.L., Dudley M.E., Citrin D.E., Somerville R.P., Wunderlich J.R., Danforth D.N., Zlott D.A., Yang J.C., Sherry R.M., Kammula U.S., et al. Randomized, Prospective Evaluation Comparing Intensity of Lymphodepletion Before Adoptive Transfer of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:2389–2397. doi: 10.1200/Jco.2016.66.7220. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curti B.D., Faries M.B. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:2229–2240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2034861. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hassel J.C., Piperno-Neumann S., Rutkowski P., Baurain J.F., Schlaak M., Butler M.O., Sullivan R.J., Dummer R., Kirkwood J.M., Orloff M., et al. Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;389:2256–2266. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304753. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources