Exploring librarians' practices when teaching advanced searching for knowledge synthesis: results from an online survey
- PMID: 39308911
- PMCID: PMC11412128
- DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1870
Exploring librarians' practices when teaching advanced searching for knowledge synthesis: results from an online survey
Abstract
Objective: There is little research available regarding the instructional practices of librarians who support students completing knowledge synthesis projects. This study addresses this research gap by identifying the topics taught, approaches, and resources that academic health sciences librarians employ when teaching students how to conduct comprehensive searches for knowledge synthesis projects in group settings.
Methods: This study applies an exploratory-descriptive design using online survey data collection. The final survey instrument included 31 open, closed, and frequency-style questions.
Results: The survey received responses from 114 participants, 74 of whom met the target population. Some key results include shared motivations to teach in groups, including student learning and curriculum requirements, as well as popular types of instruction such as single session seminars, and teaching techniques, such as lectures and live demos.
Conclusion: This research demonstrates the scope and coverage of librarian-led training in the knowledge synthesis research landscape. Although searching related topics such as Boolean logic were the most frequent, librarians report teaching throughout the review process like methods and reporting. Live demos and lectures were the most reported approaches to teaching, whereas gamification or student-driven learning were used rarely. Our results suggest that librarian's application of formal pedagogical approaches while teaching knowledge synthesis may be under-utilized, as most respondents did not report using any formal instructional framework.
Keywords: Evidence Synthesis; Literature Searching; teaching strategies.
Copyright © 2024 Glyneva Bradley-Ridout, Robin Parker, Lindsey Sikora, Andrea Quaiattini, Kaitlin Fuller, Margaret Nevison, Erica Nekolaichuk.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Information literacy instruction by librarians is integrated into the doctor of pharmacy curriculum in the USA but requires evidence of impact.Health Info Libr J. 2024 Nov 28. doi: 10.1111/hir.12558. Online ahead of print. Health Info Libr J. 2024. PMID: 39605247
-
Health sciences librarians' research on medical students' use of information for their studies at the medical school, University of Queensland, Australia.Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(2):141-57. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2011.562794. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011. PMID: 21534114
-
Current status of information literacy instruction practices in medical libraries of Pakistan.J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Oct;102(4):281-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.4.009. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014. PMID: 25349546 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion principles into instruction: Case studies from the University of Florida's Health Science Center Libraries.Health Info Libr J. 2023 Sep;40(3):332-338. doi: 10.1111/hir.12490. Epub 2023 Jun 1. Health Info Libr J. 2023. PMID: 37264557 Review.
-
Evidence-based medicine at the intersection of research interests between academic health sciences librarians and medical educators: a review of the literature.J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Oct;100(4):251-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.4.006. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012. PMID: 23133324 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Pickering C, Grignon J, Steven R, Guitart D, Byrne J.. Publishing not perishing: how research students transitionfrom novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitativeliterature reviews [Internet]. Stud High Educ. 2015. [cited 30Aug 2023];40(10):1756–69. DOI:10.1080/03075079.2014.914907. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2014.914907. - DOI - DOI
-
- Christian R, Palokas M.. Systematic review methodology in graduate nursing education. JBI Database System RevImplement Rep [Internet]. 2018. Mar [cited 30 Aug2023];16(3):587–8. DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003704. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29521855. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Swart C.. Psychology students’ perceptions of the extent to which group-based systematic review methodology at honours level prepared them for further postgraduatestudies. University of the Western Cape. 2016.
-
- Puljak L, Sapunar D.. Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe. Syst Rev [Internet]. 2017. [cited 30 Aug 2023];6(1):253. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0653-x. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Olsson C, Ringnér A, Borglin G.. Including systematic reviews in PhD programmes and candidatures in nursing–‘Hobson's choice’? Nurse Educ Pract [Internet]. 2014. [cited 30 Aug 2023];14(2):102–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.01.005. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24480093. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous