Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 1;112(3):238-249.
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1870. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

Exploring librarians' practices when teaching advanced searching for knowledge synthesis: results from an online survey

Affiliations

Exploring librarians' practices when teaching advanced searching for knowledge synthesis: results from an online survey

Glyneva Bradley-Ridout et al. J Med Libr Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: There is little research available regarding the instructional practices of librarians who support students completing knowledge synthesis projects. This study addresses this research gap by identifying the topics taught, approaches, and resources that academic health sciences librarians employ when teaching students how to conduct comprehensive searches for knowledge synthesis projects in group settings.

Methods: This study applies an exploratory-descriptive design using online survey data collection. The final survey instrument included 31 open, closed, and frequency-style questions.

Results: The survey received responses from 114 participants, 74 of whom met the target population. Some key results include shared motivations to teach in groups, including student learning and curriculum requirements, as well as popular types of instruction such as single session seminars, and teaching techniques, such as lectures and live demos.

Conclusion: This research demonstrates the scope and coverage of librarian-led training in the knowledge synthesis research landscape. Although searching related topics such as Boolean logic were the most frequent, librarians report teaching throughout the review process like methods and reporting. Live demos and lectures were the most reported approaches to teaching, whereas gamification or student-driven learning were used rarely. Our results suggest that librarian's application of formal pedagogical approaches while teaching knowledge synthesis may be under-utilized, as most respondents did not report using any formal instructional framework.

Keywords: Evidence Synthesis; Literature Searching; teaching strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantitative responses to the question: What organization format do you use when teaching comprehensive searching methods for KS in group settings? Select all that apply.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Responses to the question: In preparing for, delivering, or following up on group instructional sessions, how often do you use the following tools and activities to teach comprehensive searching methods for KS?
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quantitative responses to the question: When teaching comprehensive searching methods for KS in group settings, what, if any, preparatory work do you typically assign for learners to complete prior to the instructional encounter? Select all that apply.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Quantitative responses to the question: When teaching comprehensive searching methods for KS in group settings, how do you assess student learning? Select all that apply.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Quantitative responses to the question: How do you assess your teaching of comprehensive searching methods for KS in group settings? Select all that apply.

Similar articles

References

    1. Pickering C, Grignon J, Steven R, Guitart D, Byrne J.. Publishing not perishing: how research students transitionfrom novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitativeliterature reviews [Internet]. Stud High Educ. 2015. [cited 30Aug 2023];40(10):1756–69. DOI:10.1080/03075079.2014.914907. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2014.914907. - DOI - DOI
    1. Christian R, Palokas M.. Systematic review methodology in graduate nursing education. JBI Database System RevImplement Rep [Internet]. 2018. Mar [cited 30 Aug2023];16(3):587–8. DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003704. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29521855. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swart C.. Psychology students’ perceptions of the extent to which group-based systematic review methodology at honours level prepared them for further postgraduatestudies. University of the Western Cape. 2016.
    1. Puljak L, Sapunar D.. Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe. Syst Rev [Internet]. 2017. [cited 30 Aug 2023];6(1):253. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0653-x. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29233170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olsson C, Ringnér A, Borglin G.. Including systematic reviews in PhD programmes and candidatures in nursing–‘Hobson's choice’? Nurse Educ Pract [Internet]. 2014. [cited 30 Aug 2023];14(2):102–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.01.005. PMID: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24480093. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources