Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 16:18:2593-2603.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S473303. eCollection 2024.

36-Month Outcomes of Standalone Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Compared with Ab-Interno Closed Conjunctiva Xen Gel Stent Implantation

Affiliations

36-Month Outcomes of Standalone Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy Compared with Ab-Interno Closed Conjunctiva Xen Gel Stent Implantation

Nithya Boopathiraj et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and effectiveness of standalone Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) excisional goniotomy to standalone ab-interno Xen gel stent implantation in eyes with moderate-to-severe open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

Methods: A single-center, retrospective study including eyes with moderate-to-severe OAG undergoing standalone KDB goniotomy or Xen gel stent implantation was conducted. Intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of antiglaucoma medications taken daily, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were recorded at baseline and for up to 36-months. Primary outcomes assessed included changes from baseline in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications taken. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using independent-samples Student's t-tests. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events and the need for glaucoma surgical re-interventions were also recorded.

Results: Eyes receiving standalone KDB (n=26) or Xen gel stent (n=45) surgery were analyzed. The baseline mean IOP and number of antiglaucoma medications in both groups were as follows: KDB: 23.2 ± 6.0 mmHg, 2.2 ± 1.4 medications; Xen: 22.7 ± 8.8 mmHg, 3.0 ± 1.0 medications. At 36 months, IOP was reduced to 16.6 ± 5.4 mmHg in KDB eyes (n=23, -23.5%; p=0.0004) and 15.3 ± 5.6 mmHg in Xen gel stent eyes (n=15, -22.1%; p=0.006), while number of antiglaucoma medications was reduced to 1.1 ± 0.7 (-30.8%; p=0.0005) and 2.2 ± 1.4 (-25.6%; p=0.01), respectively. Three eyes (11.5%) in the KDB group and 19 eyes (42.2%) in the Xen gel stent group required additional surgery before month 36 due to refractory high IOP.

Conclusion: Both KDB goniotomy and Xen gel stent implantation significantly lowered the IOP and antiglaucoma medication burden in patients with moderate-to-severe OAG. While the Xen gel stent is frequently used to treat moderate-to-severe OAG patients with uncontrolled IOP, standalone KDB goniotomy may be equally effective as a long-term intervention, reducing the need for subsequent glaucoma surgery.

Keywords: kahook dual blade; micro-invasive glaucoma surgery; open angle glaucoma; xen gel stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean IOP (in mmHg) at baseline and all time points for KDB goniotomy and Xen gel stent implantation groups. N values at baseline, 1 month, 3 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 and 36 months were 26, 26, 23, 22, 24, 18, and 23 in the KDB group and 45, 44, 42, 34, 25, 21and 15 in Xen Gel Microstent group. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability of failure for Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy and Xen gel stent implant. There was significant difference between both groups (log-rank p= 0.008).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean medication use at baseline and all time points for KDB goniotomy and Xen gel stent implantation groups. N values at baseline, 1 month, 3 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 and 36 months were 26, 26, 23, 22, 24, 18, and 23 in the KDB group and 45, 44, 42, 34, 25, 21and 15 in Xen Gel Microstent group. Error bars indicate standard deviation.

References

    1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040 -. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang N, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13762. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression - Results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol-Chic. 2002;120(10):1268–1279. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(11):1943–1953. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00873-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Veldhuisen PC, Ederer F, Gaasterland DE, et al. The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–440. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources