Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 9;28(5):542.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14675. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Bone sialoprotein stimulates cancer cell adhesion through the RGD motif and the αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin receptors

Affiliations

Bone sialoprotein stimulates cancer cell adhesion through the RGD motif and the αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin receptors

Valentina Kottmann et al. Oncol Lett. .

Abstract

Being implicated in bone metastasis development, bone sialoprotein (BSP) expression is upregulated in patients with cancer. While BSP regulates cancer cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, to the best of our knowledge, the specific adhesive molecular interactions in metastatic bone disease remain unclear. The present study aimed to improve the understanding of the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) sequence of BSP and the integrin receptors αvβ3 and αvβ5 in BSP-mediated cancer cell adhesion. Human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231), prostate cancer (PC-3) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCI-H460) cell lines were cultured on BSP-coated plates. Adhesion assays with varying BSP concentrations were performed to evaluate the effect of exogenous glycine-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine-proline (GRGDSP) peptide and anti-integrin antibodies on the attachment of cancer cells to BSP. Cell attachment was assessed using the alamarBlue® assay. The present results indicated that BSP supported the adhesion of cancer cells. The RGD counterpart GRGDSP peptide reduced the attachment of all tested cancer cell lines to BSP by ≤98.4%. Experiments with anti-integrin antibodies demonstrated differences among integrin receptors and cancer cell types. The αvβ5 antibody decreased NSCLC cell adhesion to BSP by 84.3%, while the αvβ3 antibody decreased adhesion by 14%. The αvβ3 antibody decreased PC-3 cell adhesion to BSP by 46.4%, while the αvβ5 antibody decreased adhesion by 9.5%. Adhesion of MDA-MB-231 cells to BSP was inhibited by 54.7% with αvβ5 antibody. The present results demonstrated that BSP-induced cancer cell adhesion occurs through the binding of the RGD sequence of BSP to the cell integrin receptors αvβ3 and αvβ5. Differences between cancer types were found regarding the mediation via αvβ3 or αvβ5 receptors. The present findings may explain why certain cancer cells preferentially spread to the bone tissue, suggesting that targeting the RGD-integrin binding interaction could be a promising novel cancer treatment option.

Keywords: BSP; RGD; cell adhesion; integrin receptors; metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FPA is the CEO of Immundiagnostik AG and FC is an employee of Immundiagnostik AG. AB was an employee of Immundiagnostik AG at the time of the study. Immundiagnostik AG supplied the human bone sialoprotein and provided funding. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Adhesion of cancer cell lines to various surface coatings, as determined by the alamarBlue® assay. (A) MDA-MB-231 (n=5), (B) PC-3 (n=5) and (C) NCI-H460 (n=5) cancer cells attached to PBS, BSP and FN. Error bars represent the standard deviation. ****P<0.0001 vs. negative control (PBS). PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BSP, bone sialoprotein; FN, fibronectin.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Increased attachment of human cancer cells to BSP with increasing protein concentrations, as determined by the alamarBlue® assay. (A) MDA-MB-231 (n=9), (B) PC-3 (n=9) and (C) NCI-H460 (n=9) cancer cells attached to BSP after 2 h. Error bars represent the standard deviation. BSP, bone sialoprotein.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effects of exogenous GRGDSP peptide on cancer cell adhesion to BSP, as determined by the alamarBlue® assay. (A) MDA-MB-231 (n=9), (B) PC-3 (n=9) and (C) NCI-H460 (n=9) cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the presence of increasing concentrations of GRGDSP peptide. Afterwards, cells were cultured for 2 h on BSP-coated plates and attached cells were examined. Data are reported as percentages compared with 0 µM GRGDSP (100%). Error bars represent the standard deviation. ****P<0.0001 vs. negative control (0 µM GRGDSP). GRGDSP, glycine-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine-proline; BSP, bone sialoprotein.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of incubation with (A) 0, (B) 7.5, (C) 15, (D) 30 or (E) 60 µM glycine-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine-proline peptide for 30 min and 2 h culturing on BSP-coated plates on the adhesion to BSP and morphology of PC-3 cells (magnification, ×20). BSP, bone sialoprotein.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effect of anti-αvβ3 or anti-αvβ5 antibody on cancer cell adhesion to BSP, as determined by the alamarBlue® assay. (A) MDA-MB-231 (n=4), (B) PC-3 (n=4) and (C) NCI-H460 (n=4) cells were incubated for 60 min at 37°C in the presence of 10 µg/ml isotype control IgG1, 10 µg/ml anti-αvβ3 antibody or 10 µg/ml anti-αvβ5 antibody. Afterwards, cells were cultured for 2 h on BSP-coated plates and attached cells were examined. Data are reported as percentages compared with 10 µg/ml isotype control IgG1 (100%). Error bars represent the standard deviation. **P<0.01; ****P<0.0001 vs. negative control IgG1. BSP, bone sialoprotein; ns, not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021;5:33588. - PubMed
    1. Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science. 2011;331:1559–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.1203543. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Disibio G, French SW. Metastatic patterns of cancers: Results from a large autopsy study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:931–939. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-931-MPOCRF. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riihimäki M, Thomsen H, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Hemminki K. Clinical landscape of cancer metastases. Cancer Med. 2018;7:5534–5542. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1697. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Budczies J, von Winterfeld M, Klauschen F, Bockmayr M, Lennerz JK, Denkert C, Wolf T, Warth A, Dietel M, Anagnostopoulos I, et al. The landscape of metastatic progression patterns across major human cancers. Oncotarget. 2015;6:570–583. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2677. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources