Prognosis of myocarditis stratified by initial clinical presentation: Does "intermediate" risk still play a role?
- PMID: 39310054
- PMCID: PMC11416600
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100458
Prognosis of myocarditis stratified by initial clinical presentation: Does "intermediate" risk still play a role?
Abstract
Background/aims: Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease with diverse clinical presentations. It is known that low-risk patients have a good prognosis compared to high-risk patients. There are few data regarding the prognosis of intermediate-risk patients. This study aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocarditis with different risk profiles at presentation, focusing on the intermediate risk one.
Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted, enrolling patients who met the diagnostic criteria for clinically suspected myocarditis with acute presentation. Patients were stratified into high, intermediate and low risk, according to the classification proposed by Sinagra and his team. Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were assessed after a median follow-up of 19 months. Echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters predictive of adverse events have been reported.
Results: We enrolled 127 patients (mean age 30 ± 13 years; 103 men, 24 women). High-risk patients had a higher frequency of adverse events (80 %) compared to other groups (16 %-16 %, p < 0.0001). An association was observed between the number of segments with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at baseline CMR and the occurrence of adverse events (p < 0.0037). The sum of segments with LGE was statistically correlated with lower left ventricular GLS (p < 0.009). The number of segments with LGE that most accurately identified the occurrence of adverse events was 2.5 [AUC 0.5; p = 0.24].
Conclusions: Our study confirms the higher incidence of AE in the high group; the prognosis of patients at intermediate risk is not very different from those at low risk. It can be hypothesized that the extent of LGE at baseline is the main predictor of adverse events in patients at intermediate risk.
Keywords: Classification; Myocarditis; Outcomes; Prognosis; Risk; Stratification.
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Myocardial biomarkers and delayed enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance relationship in clinically suspected myocarditis and insight on clinical outcome.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Oct;16(10):696-703. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000024. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015. PMID: 24933194
-
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Strain in Suspected Myocarditis With Preserved LV-EF: A Comparison Between Patients With Negative and Positive Late Gadolinium Enhancement Findings.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Apr;55(4):1109-1119. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27873. Epub 2021 Aug 8. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022. PMID: 34369030
-
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phenotypes and Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis.JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;7(10):1057-1066. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2981. JAMA Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 36103165 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Impact of Late Gadolinium Enhancement by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;14(1):e011492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011492. Epub 2021 Jan 14. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33441003
-
The prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in myocarditis and clinically suspected myocarditis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2616-2626. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06643-5. Epub 2020 Feb 10. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32040731
Cited by
-
Baseline and Follow-Up Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Children with Acute Myocarditis and Factors Associated with Late Gadolinium Enhancement.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 31;14(1):189. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010189. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39797272 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cooper L.T., Jr., Keren A., Sliwa K., Matsumori A., Mensah G.A. The global burden of myocarditis: part 1: a systematic literature review for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2010 study. Glob. Heart. 2014;9:121–129. - PubMed
-
- Anzini M., Merlo M., Sabbadini G., Barbati G., Finocchiaro G., Pinamonti B., et al. Long-term evolution and prognostic stratification of biopsy-proven active myocarditis. Circulation. 2013;128(22):2384–2394. - PubMed
-
- Aretz H.T. Myocarditis: the Dallas criteria. Hum. Pathol. 1987;18(6):619–624. - PubMed
-
- Caforio A.L., Pankuweit S., Arbustini E., Basso C., Gimeno-Blanes J., Felix S.B., et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur. Heart J. 2013;34(33):2636–2648. 2648a-2648d. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous