Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Assessment of the Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa Model in Malignancy Prediction Among Women With Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39310483
- PMCID: PMC11413719
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67365
Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Assessment of the Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa Model in Malignancy Prediction Among Women With Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Transvaginal ultrasonography (USG) is most commonly used before surgery to accurately diagnose benign and malignant ovarian masses for effective treatment, avoid unnecessary interventions, improve the prognosis of patients, and preserve fertility in patients with benign tumors. Therefore, the objective of the present systematic review was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules (SR) and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model in predicting malignancy among women with adnexal masses. A systematic literature search was carried out on electronic databases consisting of Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The keywords utilized to perform the literature search and include relevant articles consisted of "Diagnostic Efficacy", AND "Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules", AND "International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX Model", AND "Adnexal masses", AND "Ovarian tumors". Based on the selection criteria, a total of five studies were included. The study concluded that both the models showed high diagnostic efficacy for malignancy prediction; however, in comparison to the IOTA SR, the IOTA ADNEX model demonstrated good diagnostic efficacy.
Keywords: adnexal masses; diagnostic efficacy; iota simple rules; iota-adnex model; ovarian tumors.
Copyright © 2024, Suryawanshi et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;59(5):668-676. doi: 10.1002/uog.24777. Epub 2022 Apr 8. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34533862
-
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model for Predicting Malignancy in Women with Ovarian Tumors: A Prospective Cohort Study.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Apr 27;4(1):202-210. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0072. eCollection 2023. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023. PMID: 37139467 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) With IOTA Simple Rules and ADNEX Model for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A Head-To-Head Meta-Analysis.J Clin Ultrasound. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1002/jcu.24048. Online ahead of print. J Clin Ultrasound. 2025. PMID: 40298029 Review.
-
Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Feb;41(2):471-482. doi: 10.1002/jum.15728. Epub 2021 Apr 23. J Ultrasound Med. 2022. PMID: 33890698
-
The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis-Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa (IOTA-ADNEX) Model Assessment for Risk of Ovarian Malignancy in Adnexal Masses.Cureus. 2022 Nov 7;14(11):e31194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31194. eCollection 2022 Nov. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36505142 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic treatment of a rare primary peritoneal serous borderline tumor: Case report and narrative review of the literature.Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Apr 9;59:101742. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101742. eCollection 2025 Jun. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40276631 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ovarian cancer. Jayson GC, Kohn EC, Kitchener HC, Ledermann JA. Lancet. 2014;384:1376–1388. - PubMed
-
- Cancer statistics, 2019. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34. - PubMed
-
- Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study. [ Jul; 2024 ];Piovano E, Cavallero C, Fuso L, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 50:395–403. - PubMed
-
- Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:327–340. - PubMed
-
- Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Fischerova D. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:246–266. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials