Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 21;16(8):e67399.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.67399. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Exploring Motivating Factors for Pursuing Radiation Oncology: A Comparative Analysis of Medical Students and Residents

Affiliations

Exploring Motivating Factors for Pursuing Radiation Oncology: A Comparative Analysis of Medical Students and Residents

Brandon S Chai et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Purpose Increasing medical student (MS) interest in radiation oncology (RO) is important to meet the rising demand for radiation oncologists. Understanding the factors that drive MS to pursue RO is crucial. This study compares motivating factors between MS and RO residents to inform interventions to increase recruitment and sustained interest in the specialty. Methods Data from two similar studies investigating factors motivating MS and residents to pursue RO were analyzed. The first study surveyed Canadian RO residents to characterize enablers when applying for RO residency. The second study analyzed application essays from MS applying to an RO studentship. A mixed methods approach was used to compare themes ("career aspects," "prior exposure," and "personal experiences") between the datasets. Results Qualitative analysis demonstrated that both MS and residents identified "career aspects" as the most common theme facilitating interest in RO careers. "Multidisciplinary work" and "direct clinical contact and patient care" were prominent sub-themes. MS emphasized "serious illness and palliative care" and "advanced technology," while residents prioritized RO as a "rewarding career." "Prior exposure," particularly through shadowing/observerships, was more important for MS than residents who valued clinical experiences. Practical career considerations including "mentorship" and "career satisfaction and lifestyle" were significant motivators for residents. Conclusion MS value content-based aspects of RO and emphasize shadowing. In contrast, RO residents prioritize lifestyle-based considerations. These differences highlight the opportunity for intervention throughout medical training to sustain interest in RO and facilitate applications to RO residency programs.

Keywords: medical education; medical students; mentorship; professional identity; radiation oncology; residents; specialty selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.3635. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9:193–199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2022. Brenner DR, Poirier A, Woods RR, et al. CMAJ. 2022;194:0–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Supply and demand for radiation oncologists in Canada: workforce planning projections from 2020 to 2040. Loewen SK, Ruan Y, Wu CH, et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.026. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024;119:756–770. - PubMed
    1. The radiation oncology match in 2023: suggestion of a nadir. Bates JE, Amdur RJ, Lee WR. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2023.03.014. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023;13:289–290. - PubMed
    1. Unfilled positions in the 2022 radiation oncology match: a reduction in positions. Bates JE, Amdur RJ, Lee WR. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2022.03.014 Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022;12:0–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources