Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 22;16(8):e67456.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.67456. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Midwives' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Perinatal Care for Women With Disabilities

Athina Diamanti  1 , Maria Vasiliki Zampeli  1 , Chrysoula Taskou  1 , Aikaterini Lykeridou  1 , Antigoni Sarantaki  1
Affiliations

Midwives' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Perinatal Care for Women With Disabilities

Athina Diamanti et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction: Women with disabilities (WWD) face significant barriers to accessing quality perinatal care, resulting in adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns. Midwives are crucial in providing this care, but their knowledge and attitudes can impact the quality of services delivered. This study aims to examine midwives' knowledge and attitudes toward perinatal care for WWD and identify factors influencing these aspects.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2023, involving 149 midwives from various healthcare settings. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire addressing demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to perinatal care for WWD. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used for analysis, with a significance level set at 0.05.

Results: The sample comprised predominantly female midwives (146, 98%), with a mean age of 33.7 years and a mean of 9.8 years of work experience. Only 48 (32.2%) reported workplaces equipped for perinatal care for WWD. Most participants rated the perinatal care services in Greece for WWD as moderate (87, 58.4%) and believed that the medical staff's knowledge in this area was insufficient (148, 99.3%). The mean knowledge score was 35 points out of 100, indicating a low level of knowledge. Key barriers included the lack of adapted services (148, 99.3%) and insufficient infrastructure (143, 96%). Despite these challenges, 142 (95.3%) midwives supported the right of WWD to have children. Significant correlations were found between higher knowledge scores and less specialized attitudes, while more perceived barriers correlated with a greater need for further education.

Conclusions: This study highlights the urgent need for improved education and training programs for midwives to enhance their knowledge and attitudes toward perinatal care for WWD. Addressing educational and structural barriers is essential to provide equitable and high-quality care. Policymakers should prioritize creating inclusive healthcare environments and support ongoing professional development for midwives.

Keywords: disability-inclusive training; healthcare barriers; midwives' attitudes; perinatal care; women with disabilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethical Committee, University of West Attica, issued approval 20/09032022. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References

    1. World report on disability. Lancet. 2011;377:1977. - PubMed
    1. Perinatal care for women with disabilities: clinical considerations. Byrnes L, Hickey M. J Nurse Pract. 2016;12:503–509.
    1. Barriers in access to healthcare for women with disabilities: a systematic review in qualitative studies. Matin BK, Williamson HJ, Karyani AK, Rezaei S, Soofi M, Soltani S. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21:44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Access to and satisfaction with prenatal care among pregnant women with physical disabilities: findings from a national survey. Mitra M, Akobirshoev I, Moring NS, Long-Bellil L, Smeltzer SC, Smith LD, Iezzoni LI. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017;26:1356–1363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Midwives' comprehension of care for women with intellectual disability during pregnancy and childbirth: an open-ended questionnaire study in Sweden. Höglund B, Larsson M. Women Birth. 2015;28:0–62. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources