Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Sep-Oct;100(5):539-47.

Racial differences in the relation of birth weight and gestational age to neonatal mortality

Comparative Study

Racial differences in the relation of birth weight and gestational age to neonatal mortality

G R Alexander et al. Public Health Rep. 1985 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Utilizing South Carolina live birth-infant death cohort files for the period 1975-80, this study examines the bivariate distribution of birth weight-gestational age (BW-GA), intrauterine growth curves, and BW-GA specific neonatal mortality rates (NMRs) by race. Comparison of BW-GA distributions revealed an appreciable shift between racial subgroups. Nonwhites, on the average, were born 1 week earlier and 270 grams lighter in weight than whites. In addition to racial differences in rates of intrauterine growth, nonwhites experienced lower BW-GA NMRs than whites in BW-GA categories less than 3,000 grams and less than 38 weeks. However, the improved mortality experience of nonwhites at more immature BW-GA categories was not consistently present when different cause-specific NMRs were considered. These persistent racial variations highlight continuing issues regarding both the use of a single norm for defining low birth weight or prematurity and the role of nonsocioeconomic factors related to racial BW-GA distribution and mortality disparities. As birth weight and gestational age represent empirical indicators of the maturity and survivability of an infant at birth, these data and previous supporting research raise further concerns regarding the ability of these indicators to accurately reflect equivalent fetal development and subsequent risk of mortality among racial groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Nov;24:716-21 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964 Nov;54:1841-55 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1977 May;90(5):809-10 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Nov 1;126(5):555-64 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 1975 Jun;4(2):163-72 - PubMed

Publication types