Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder in surgical candidates for liver metastases: Prevalence, noninvasive diagnosis, and burden on surgical outcomes
- PMID: 39311847
- DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000489
Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder in surgical candidates for liver metastases: Prevalence, noninvasive diagnosis, and burden on surgical outcomes
Abstract
Chemotherapy can cause vascular and metabolic liver injury in patients with liver metastases, but scarce data are available. We aimed to (i) describe the prevalence of porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) among patients undergoing resection for liver metastases; and (ii) assess whether liver (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurements could diagnose PSVD and predict postoperative complications. This is a prospective single-center study enrolling consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastases at a tertiary center. For each patient, we evaluated previous exposure to chemotherapy, comorbidities, elastography, type of surgery, histological features at the resection specimen, morbidity (post-hepatectomy liver failure and major complications according to Clavien-Dindo), and 90-day survival. Sixty-eight patients were included, of whom 60 (88%) had received chemotherapy. Twenty-nine (44%) patients had PSVD. Spleen stiffness measurements <21 kPa (negative predictive value 87%) and >40 kPa (positive predictive value 100%) could accurately diagnose PSVD. PSVD significantly increased the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (22% vs. 45%) and major complications (11% vs. 31%). Preoperative LSM was associated with postoperative morbidity. The cutoff LSMs <4.5 and >8 kPa predicted the risk of clinically significant post-hepatectomy liver failure (0%, 11%, and 33% in LSM <4.5, 4.5-8, and >8 kPa, respectively) and major complications (0%, 25%, 44% in LSM <4.5, 4.5-8, and >8 kPa, respectively). PSVD is very common among patients undergoing liver surgery for metastases, and it is associated with increased morbidity. LSM and spleen stiffness measurements can correctly identify patients with PSVD and those at risk of clinically relevant postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
References
-
- Adam R, De Gramont A, Figueras J, Guthrie A, Kokudo N, Kunstlinger F, et al. The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A multidisciplinary international consensus. Oncologist. 2012;17:1225–1239.
-
- Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–1422.
-
- Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ, Eng C, Sargent DJ, Larson DW, et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3677–3683.
-
- Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): Long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1208–1215.
-
- Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: Expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1261–1268.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical