Adverse events related to robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study from the MAUDE database
- PMID: 39311943
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05501-4
Adverse events related to robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study from the MAUDE database
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted surgical technique has been clinically available for decades, yet real-world adverse events (AEs) and complications associated with primary knee arthroplasty remain unclear.
Methods: In March 2023, we searched the FDA website and extracted AEs related to robotic assisted knee arthroplasty (RAKA) from the MAUDE database over the past 10 years. The "Brand Name" function queried major robotic platforms, including active and semi-active systems. The overall incidence of AEs was estimated based on annual surgical volume from the current American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). Two authors independently collected data on event date, event type, device problem, and patient problem.
Results: Of 839 eligible reports, device malfunction comprised mechanical failure (343/839, 40.88%) and software failure (261/839, 31.11%). For surgical complications, inappropriate bone resection (115/839, 13.71%) was most frequent, followed by bone/soft tissue damage (83/839, 9.89%). Notably, over-resection exceeding 2 mm (88/839, 10.49%), joint infection (25/839, 2.98%), and aseptic loosening (1/839, 0.12%) were major complications. Only two track pins related AEs were found. Moreover, the distribution of these AEs differed substantially between robot manufacturers. According to the AEs volume and AJRR data, the overall incidences of AEs related to RAKAs were calculated with 0.83% (839/100,892) between November 2010 and March 2023.
Conclusion: Our analysis shows that while reported AEs might be increasing for RAKAs, the overall rate remains relatively low. Reassuringly, device malfunction was the most commonly AEs observed, with a minor impact on postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, our data provide a benchmark for patients, surgeons, and manufacturers to evaluate RAKA performance, though continued improvement in reducing serious AEs incidence is warranted.
Keywords: Adverse events; Complication; Knee arthroplasty; MAUDE database; Robotic-assisted.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
How Often Does Technology Fail in Robotic-Assisted Arthroplasty? A Comprehensive Analysis of a United States Food and Drug Administration Database.J Arthroplasty. 2025 Mar;40(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.005. Epub 2024 Sep 14. J Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 39284394
-
Adverse Events Associated With Robotic-Assisted Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database.J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8):1526-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.060. Epub 2022 Mar 21. J Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35314290
-
Characterizing the complication profile of spinal robotic systems: A MAUDE analysis of device failures and associated complications by device manufacturer and brand name.J Clin Neurosci. 2025 May;135:111149. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111149. Epub 2025 Feb 25. J Clin Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40010171
-
Pin-Related Complications in Computer Navigated and Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.J Arthroplasty. 2022 Nov;37(11):2291-2307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 7. J Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35537611
-
Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database.Can J Urol. 2008 Feb;15(1):3912-6. Can J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18304403 Review.
Cited by
-
Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted arthroplasty: a CiteSpace-based bibliometric and visualized analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 11;19(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02331-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40214862 Review.
References
-
- Kamenaga T, Muratsu H, Kanda Y, Miya H, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T (2018) The influence of postoperative knee stability on patient satisfaction in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33(8):2475–2479
-
- Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A et al (2018) Knee replacement. Lancet 392(10158):1672–1682 - PubMed
-
- Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland JD (2019) Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020–2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol 46(9):1134–1140 - PubMed
-
- Website The Ninth Annual Report of the AJRR on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Available at: https://www.aaos.org/registries/publications/ajrr-annual-report/ . Accessed 2023
-
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous