Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Sep 23;28(1):130.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02997-1.

Cost-benefit analysis and short-term outcomes after implementing an ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis

I Ruiz Torres  1 , A B Serrano  1 , L D Juez  2 , A Ballestero Pérez  3 , J Ocaña Jiménez  3 , J Die Trill  3   4 , J M Fernandez Cebrian  3   4 , J C García Pérez  3   4
Affiliations
Observational Study

Cost-benefit analysis and short-term outcomes after implementing an ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis

I Ruiz Torres et al. Tech Coloproctol. .

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly popular in the post-operative management of abdominal surgery. Published data suggest that patients on ERAS protocols have fewer minor and major complications, and highlight a reduction in medical morbidity (such as urinary and respiratory infections). Limited data is available on surgical complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the ERAS protocol on post-operative complications and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the impact of this protocol on cost-effectiveness.

Material and methods: From January 2016 to December 2022, 532 colectomies for colorectal cancer (CRC) were performed. A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital on the cohort of patients, aged 18 years and older, operated on for non-urgent colorectal cancer. The impact on post-operative complications, hospital stay and economic impact was analysed in two groups: patients managed under ERAS and non-ERAS protocol. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed between the two groups.

Results: After propensity score matching 1:1, each cohort included 71 patients, and clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced in terms of tumour type, surgical technique and surgical approach. ERAS patients experienced fewer infectious complications and a shorter postoperative stay (p < 0.001). In particular, they had an 8.5% reduction in anastomotic dehiscence (p = 0.012) and surgical wound infections (p = 0.029). After analysis of medical complications, no statistically significant differences were identified in urinary tract infections, pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding or sepsis. ERAS protocol was more efficient and cost-effective than the control group, with an overall savings of 37,673.44€.

Conclusions: The implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colorectal surgery in a tertiary hospital was cost-effective and associated with a reduction in post-operative complications, especially infectious complications.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Cost-effectiveness; ERAS; Protocol compliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152(3):292–298 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lv L, Shao YF, Zhou Y (2012) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(12):1549–1554 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Stowers MDJ, Hill AG (2014) A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16(5):338–346 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee L, Mata J, Ghitulescu GA, Boutros M, Charlebois P, Stein B et al (2015) Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 262(6):1026–1033 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources