Rupture of fetal membrane in ectopic tubal pregnancy: A case report and literature review
- PMID: 39312322
- PMCID: PMC11419522
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039713
Rupture of fetal membrane in ectopic tubal pregnancy: A case report and literature review
Abstract
Rationale: Ruptured tubal pregnancies occurring in the second trimester are rare; yet, they pose a critical risk of life-threatening hemorrhage. This study aims to highlight the importance of timely surgical intervention in such cases to prevent fatal outcomes. The case underscores the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges that arise when distinguishing between tubal and abdominal pregnancies, particularly in the presence of hemoperitoneum, which can obscure imaging results.
Patient concerns: We present a case involving the spontaneous rupture of a tubal pregnancy at 15 weeks and 3 days of gestation. The patient exhibited elevated beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. Initial transabdominal ultrasound suggested an abdominal pregnancy, and computed tomography scans supported these findings.
Diagnoses and interventions: Urgent midline laparotomy revealed the condition to be a tubal pregnancy, contrary to initial imaging. The surgical procedure included the removal of the gestational sac and the affected fallopian tube, followed by abdominal closure. Hemoperitoneum was noted to compromise the accuracy of imaging modalities, complicating the preoperative diagnosis.
Outcomes: Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged 7 days post-surgery with stable hemoglobin levels.
Lessons: This case underscores the importance of considering the differential diagnosis of abdominal versus tubal pregnancy in the presence of hemoperitoneum, due to their differing clinical management needs. It offers insights that may guide clinicians in the timely diagnosis and treatment of advanced tubal pregnancies, where prompt surgical intervention is critical.
Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic Management of Abdominal Pregnancy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):724-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Feb 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28179200
-
Ruptured secondary abdominal pregnancy after primary laparoscopic treatment for tubal pregnancy: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(50):e9254. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009254. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29390363 Free PMC article.
-
Twin tubal pregnancy: A large unruptured ectopic pregnancy.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Nov;41(11):1820-2. doi: 10.1111/jog.12771. Epub 2015 Jul 14. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015. PMID: 26178425
-
Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in tubally sterilized women.Aust N Z J Surg. 1993 Jan;63(1):68-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00037.x. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993. PMID: 8466465 Review.
-
Omentum pregnancy resulting in severe hemoperitoneum: Lessons learned from a review of the literature along with a case report.J Int Med Res. 2024 Jul;52(7):3000605241261893. doi: 10.1177/03000605241261893. J Int Med Res. 2024. PMID: 39053448 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Creanga AA, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Bish CL, Zane S, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM. Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980-2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:837–43. - PubMed
-
- Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:379–87. - PubMed
-
- Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet. 2005;366:583–91. - PubMed
-
- Parker VL, Srinivas M. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:19–27. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources