Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;39(6):1475-1482.
doi: 10.1002/ncp.11213. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

ASPEN international survey on ethical competencies dealing with decision-making in the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration and competency application in clinical practice

Denise Baird Schwartz  1 , Sarah Sumner  2 , Diana Cardenas  3 , Theodoric Wong  4 , Maria Giuseppina Annetta  5 , Babak Goldman  1 , Albert Barrocas  6 , Sonia Echeverri  7 , Eliza Mei Perez Francisco  8 , Gil Hardy  9
Affiliations

ASPEN international survey on ethical competencies dealing with decision-making in the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration and competency application in clinical practice

Denise Baird Schwartz et al. Nutr Clin Pract. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Ethical competencies dealing with decision-making for clinicians involved in artificially administered nutrition and hydration (AANH) have not been defined in the literature. Although clinical assessments identify nutrition needs and appropriate routes of nutrition administration, an assessment of the ethical, cultural, and spiritual implications of the medical nutrition therapy may be overlooked.

Methods: Eleven competency statements were developed by members of two international sections of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. This descriptive cross-sectional survey study was conducted to measure the importance of the competency statements to the membership of two sections using a five-point Likert scale of 1-5 (1-low to 5-high).

Results: A total of 113 responses (12.5% response rate) were obtained predominantly from physicians and dietitians from 25 countries. There was a wide range of world regions of the 49% respondents outside of the United States. Means and SDs were calculated for agreement with the 11 competency statements with overall means ranging from 4.32 to 4.67. Most of the participants cared for adult/older adult patients (63.7%) exclusively, and 12.4% cared for pediatric/neonate patients exclusively; the remainder (23.9%) cared for both populations. Respondents reported they were either experienced, competent, or expert (88.6%) in dealing with ethical issues related to AANH.

Conclusion: This international interdisciplinary group agreed that the integration of ethical, cultural, and spiritual competencies into clinical decision-making regarding artificially AANH is important.

Keywords: artificially administered nutrition and hydration; ethical competencies; human rights; medical decision making; patient‐centered approach; person‐centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. British Medical Association; Royal College of Physicians; General Medical Council. Clinically‐Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (CANH) and Adults Who Lack the Capacity to Consent. Guidance for Decision‐Making in England and Wales. British Medical Association; 2018.
    1. Cárdenas D, Davisson Correia MIT, Hardy G, et al. Nutritional care is a human right: translating principles to clinical practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2022;37(4):743‐751.
    1. Corigan M, Bobo E, Rollins C, Mogensen KM. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: revised 2021 standards of practice and standards of professional performance for registered dietitian nutritionists (competent, proficient, and expert) in nutrition support. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021;121(10):2071‐2086.
    1. Druml C, Ballmer PE, Druml W, et al. ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(3):545‐556.
    1. Echeverri S, Arenas Márquez H, Hardy G, et al. La Declaración de Cartagena desde la interdisciplinariedad. Rev Nutr Clin Metabol. 2019;2(suppl 1):63‐75.

LinkOut - more resources