Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection
- PMID: 39312557
- PMCID: PMC11419357
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310384
Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection
Abstract
Cross cultural differences in behavioral and verbal norms and expectations can undermine credibility, often triggering a lie bias which can result in false convictions. However, current understanding is heavily North American and Western European centric, hence how individuals from non-western cultures infer veracity is not well understood. We report novel research investigating native Arabic speakers' truth and lie judgments having observed a matched native language forensic interview with a mock person of interest. 217 observers viewed a truthful or a deceptive interview and were directed to attend to detailedness as a veracity cue or given no direction. Overall, a truth bias (66% accuracy) emerged, but observers were more accurate (79%) in the truth condition with the truthful interviewee rated as more plausible and more believable than the deceptive interviewee. However, observer accuracy dropped to just 23% when instructed to use the detailedness cue when judging veracity. Verbal veracity cues attended too were constant across veracity conditions with 'corrections' emerging as an important veracity cue. Some results deviate from the findings of research with English speaking western participants in cross- and matched-culture forensic interview contexts, but others are constant. Nonetheless, this research raises questions for research to practice in forensic contexts centred on the robustness of western centric psychological understanding for non-western within culture interviews centred on interview protocols for amplifying veracity cues and the instruction to note detailedness of verbal accounts which significantly hindered Arabic speaker's performance. Findings again highlight the challenges of pancultural assumptions for real-world practices.
Copyright: © 2024 Dando et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cross cultural verbal cues to deception: truth and lies in first and second language forensic interview contexts.Front Psychol. 2023 May 30;14:1152904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152904. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37325746 Free PMC article.
-
Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Jun;98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. doi: 10.2466/pms.98.3.1039-1048. Percept Mot Skills. 2004. PMID: 15209321 Clinical Trial.
-
Processing of veracity cues: how processing difficulty affects the memory of event description and judgment of confidence.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 May 28;10(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00629-2. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025. PMID: 40437302 Free PMC article.
-
The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection.Nat Hum Behav. 2023 May;7(5):718-728. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01556-2. Epub 2023 Mar 20. Nat Hum Behav. 2023. PMID: 36941469
-
Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Jul;14(4):646-671. doi: 10.1177/1745691619838258. Epub 2019 Jun 7. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31173537 Review.
References
-
- Hofstede G., and Hofstede G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind (2nd). New York: McGraw-Hill.
-
- Lytle A. L., Brett J. M., Barsness Z. I., Tinsley C. H., and Janssens M. (1995). A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research in organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 17, 167–214.
-
- Le L. C., Hoang Y. H., Bui H. T., Nguyen D. Q., Mai S. T., & Luong H. T. (2023). Wrongful convictions in asian countries: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 1–17.
-
- Levine T. R. (2023). Deception detection and question effects: testing truth-default theory predictions in South Korea. Human Communication Research, 49(4), 448–451.
-
- MacFarlane J., & Stratton G. (2016). Marginalisation, managerialism and wrongful conviction in Australia. Current issues in criminal justice, 27(3), 303–321.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources