Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Effect on Safety Culture and Cesarean Delivery
- PMID: 39313350
- PMCID: PMC11419729
- DOI: 10.1370/afm.3157
Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Effect on Safety Culture and Cesarean Delivery
Abstract
Purpose: Currently, 40% of counties in the United States do not have an obstetrician or midwife, and in rural areas the likelihood of childbirth being attended to by a family medicine (FM) physician is increasing. We sought to characterize the effect of the FM presence on unit culture and a key perinatal quality metric in Iowa hospital intrapartum units.
Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, we surveyed Iowa physicians, nurses, and midwives delivering intrapartum care at hospitals participating in a quality improvement initiative to decrease the incidence of cesarean delivery. We linked respondents with their hospital characteristics and outcomes data. The primary outcome was the association between FM physician, obstetrician (OB), or both disciplines' presence on labor and delivery and hospital low-risk, primary cesarean delivery rate. Unit culture was compared by hospital type (FM-only, OB-only, or Both).
Results: A total of 849 clinicians from 39 hospitals completed the survey; 13 FM-only, 11 OB-only, and 15 hospitals with both. FM-only hospitals were all rural, with <1,000 annual births. Among hospitals with <1,000 annual births, births at FM-only hospitals had an adjusted 34.3% lower risk of cesarean delivery (adjusted incident rate ratio = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-.0.98) compared with hospitals with both. Nurses endorsed unit norms more supportive of vaginal birth and stronger safety culture at FM-only hospitals (P <.05).
Conclusions: Birthing hospitals staffed exclusively by FM physicians were more likely to have lower cesarean rates and stronger nursing-rated safety culture. Both access and quality of care provide strong arguments for reinforcing the pipeline of FM physicians training in intrapartum care.
Keywords: cesarean birth; family medicine; organizational culture.
© 2024 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):1056-1065. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003521. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31599830
-
Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12702. Epub 2017 Nov 16. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 29144586
-
Variation in Hospital Intrapartum Practices and Association With Cesarean Rate.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jan-Feb;46(1):5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Nov 23. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017. PMID: 27886948
-
A new index for obstetrics safety and quality of care: integrating cesarean delivery rates with maternal and neonatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):556.e1-556.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34634261 Review.
-
Midwifery care during labor and birth in the United States.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S983-S993. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.044. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37164503 Review.
Cited by
-
Family Medicine Obstetrics: Answering the Call.Ann Fam Med. 2024 Sep-Oct;22(5):367-368. doi: 10.1370/afm.3176. Ann Fam Med. 2024. PMID: 39313343 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous