Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Sep 10:2024.09.09.612021.
doi: 10.1101/2024.09.09.612021.

ELUCIDATING THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACTS OF EQUIVALENT GATING-CHARGE MUTATIONS IN VOLTAGE-GATED SODIUM CHANNELS

Affiliations

ELUCIDATING THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACTS OF EQUIVALENT GATING-CHARGE MUTATIONS IN VOLTAGE-GATED SODIUM CHANNELS

Eslam Elhanafy et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels are pivotal for cellular signaling and mutations in Nav channels can lead to excitability disorders in cardiac, muscular, and neural tissues. A major cluster of pathological mutations localizes in the voltage-sensing domains (VSDs), resulting in either gain-of-function (GoF), loss-of-function (LoF) effects, or both. However, the mechanism behind this functional divergence of mutations at equivalent positions remains elusive. Through hotspot analysis, we identified three gating charges (R1, R2, and R3) as major mutational hotspots in VSDs. The same amino-acid substitutions at equivalent gating-charge positions in VSDI and VSDII of the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 show differential gating-property impacts in electrophysiology measurements. We conducted 120 μs molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on wild-type and six mutants to elucidate the structural basis of their differential impacts. Our μs-scale MD simulations with applied external electric fields captured VSD state transitions and revealed the differential structural dynamics between equivalent R-to-Q mutants. Notably, we observed transient leaky conformations in some mutants during structural transitions, offering a detailed structural explanation for gating-pore currents. Our salt-bridge network analysis uncovered VSD-specific and state-dependent interactions among gating charges, countercharges, and lipids. This detailed analysis elucidated how mutations disrupt critical electrostatic interactions, thereby altering VSD permeability and modulating gating properties. By demonstrating the crucial importance of considering the specific structural context of each mutation, our study represents a significant leap forward in understanding structure-function relationships in Nav channels. Our work establishes a robust framework for future investigations into the molecular basis of ion channel-related disorders.

Keywords: Disease-associated mutation; Nav channel; gating property; gating-pore current; molecular dynamics simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Stepwise deactivation of VSDs of Nav channels.
Cartoon depiction of the sequential deactivation of the Nav1.5 VSD in response to membrane potential changes. The S4 helix (blue) moves relative to static S1-S3 (gray), with negatively (−) charged countercharged residues (red) and the hydrophobic constriction site (HCS) residue (green). The S4 positively (+) charged gating charge residues adopt an up conformation under depolarized potential and transition to a down conformation as the potential recovers, illustrating the VSD’s dynamic nature.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Multiple sequence alignment of VSDs from four repeats of nine isoforms in the human Nav channel family
, highlighting countercharge residues (red), HCS (green), and gating charge residues (blue).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Mapping the mutation hotspots in VSDs of Nav channels.
The annotated disease-associated mutations from UniProt are mapped along the multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of VSDs in 9 human Nav channels. The number of mutations at the equivalent position in 4 VSDs (A), the number of phenotypes in VSDI (B), and that in VSDII (C) are used to demonstrate the mutation hotspots. (B, C) pathogenic missense mutations are colored according to GoF (green bars), LoF (red), mixed (yellow), and uncertain (black) effects. Hotspots are labeled in this figure with either the order of gating charges (A) or residue IDs from Nav1.5 (B, C).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. State transitions of VSD in a μs-scale MD simulation.
The dynamic behavior of VSDII under an external electric field of 500mV in opposite directions. Traces of z positions for Cα atoms of the gating charge residues (R1-K5) in different colors in VSDII relative to the HCS are shown to track the structural changes. Molecular images of representative VSDII snapshots (0, 3, 6, 9, and 13 μs) are presented in a white ribbon representation, with licorice representations of gating charges (blue), countercharges (red), and the HCS (green). The direction and magnitude of the external electric field applied are depicted by arrows (blue and green).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Differential impacts of R-to-Q mutations in VSDI and VSDII during up-to-down transitions.
The differential dynamic behaviors of R-to-Q mutations (R1, R2, and R3) in VSDI (A) and VSDII (B) in comparison to the wild type (WT) under an external electric field of −500mV. Traces of z positions for Cα atoms of the gating-charge residues in S4 relative to that of the HCS are shown in each panel to track the structural changes. Molecular images of VSDs are presented in a white cartoon representation, illustrating the initial and final frames with licorice representations of gating charges (blue), countercharges (red), and the HCS (green). Only one representative trajectory among three independent runs for each mutant is illustrated here.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Comparative analysis of MD up-to-down transition rates for WT and R-to-Q mutations in VSDI and VSDII.
(A) Dynamic behaviors of VSDI transitions, showing WT (black), R219Q (blue), R222Q (green), and R225Q (red). (B) Dynamic behaviors of VSDII transitions, showing WT (black), R808Q (blue), R811Q (green), and R814Q (red). Data points represent results from three independent simulation runs, depicted by filled circles, empty squares, and filled squares. All simulations begin in the up state (light blue) under an applied external electric field of −500 mV, with transitions observed towards the intermediate state (orange) and down state (gray).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Pore opening of mutants in VSDI and VSDII during MD simulations.
(A and B) Each panel depicts the time series of the minimum radius of the aqueous pathway of gating pore through VSDs during simulations. A 1.5 Å dashed line represents the potential pore opening threshold for water and ion permeation through VSDs. WT traces are presented in black, R1 mutants (R219Q and R808Q) in blue, R2 mutants (R222Q and R811Q) in green, and R3 mutants (R225Q and R814Q) in red. (C-D) Each panel shows molecular images of VSDI (C) and VSDII (D) WT and Mutants (S3 removed for clarity). In each snapshot, gating charges (blue), countercharges (red), HCS (green) residues are illustrated in licorice representation. Sodium (yellow) and chloride (gray) ions are depicted in spheres. Snapshots are selected at the time points indicated by black arrows in A and B. The water molecules are illustrated as a transparent red surface. The black dashed circles indicate the non-accessible solvent region, separating the extracellular and intracellular water milieu.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.. State-dependent salt-bridge network analysis for R-to-Q mutants in VSDI and VSDII.
Comprehensive analysis for WT and mutants (R1, R2, and R3) in VSDI (A) and VSDII (B). Each panel depicts the map of electrostatic interactions at various states (up, intermediate, and down) within each VSD. Nodes represent residues of gating charges (blue), mutated residues (orange), countercharges (red), HCS (green), and lipids (black). Edges represent the salt bridges, with numbers indicating the occupancy percentage of the interaction during each state. Countercharges are labeled with residue IDs from Nav1.5.

References

    1. Ahangar A.A., Elhanafy E., Blanton H., Li J., 2024. Mapping Structural Distribution and Gating-Property Impacts of Disease-Associated Mutations in Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels. iScience 110678. 10.1016/J.ISCI.2024.110678 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahern C.A., Payandeh J., Bosmans F., Chanda B., 2016. The hitchhiker’s guide to the voltage-gated sodium channel galaxy. Journal of General Physiology 147, 1–24. 10.1085/jgp.201511492 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahuja S., Mukund S., Deng L., Khakh K., Chang E., Ho H., Shriver S., Young C., Lin S., Johnson J.P., Wu P., Li J., Coons M., Tam C., Brillantes B., Sampang H., Mortara K., Bowman K.K., Clark K.R., Estevez A., Xie Z., Verschoof H., Grimwood M., Dehnhardt C., Andrez J.-C.J.C., Focken T., Sutherlin D.P., Safina B.S., Starovasnik M.A., Ortwine D.F., Franke Y., Cohen C.J., Hackos D.H., Koth C.M., Payandeh J., 2015. Structural basis of Nav1.7 inhibition by an isoform-selective small-molecule antagonist. Science (1979) 350, aac5464–aac5464. 10.1126/science.aac5464 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albert C., Ruben P.C., George A.L., Fujimoto E., Bezanilla F., 1999. Voltage sensors in domains III and IV, but not I and II, are immobilized by Na+ channel fast inactivation. Neuron 22, 73–87. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80680-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glazer Andrew M., Yang Tao, Li Bian, Page Dana, Fouda Mohamed, Wada Yuko, Lancaster Megan C., O’Neill Matthew J., Muhammad Ayesha, Gao Xiaozhi, Ackerman Michael J., Sanatani Shubhayan, Ruben Peter C., Roden Dan M., 2024. Multifocal Ectopic Purkinje Premature Contractions due to neutralization of an SCN5A negative charge: structural insights into the gating pore hypothesis. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2024.02.13.580021 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources