Figure 5.. Effect of RAD23A on TAR4/4 mice: proteasome level, localization and activity.
(A)Total ubiquitin levels in the soluble and insoluble fraction of WT and TAR4/4 mice treated with ASOs. The smear of ubiquitinated substrates in WT animals (insoluble and soluble fractions) is unaffected by ASO treatment. In contrast, the overall burden of total ubiquitinated substrates in the TAR4/4 mice is higher than in WT mice (in both insoluble and soluble fractions). KD of RAD23A reduces the abundance of total ubiquitinated substrates (in comparison with SCR control) in both fractions, but more significantly in the insoluble fraction. (B and C) Quantification of the ASO effects on total ubiquitin levels in the insoluble (B) and soluble (C) fraction of WT and TAR4/4 brain lysates. Group differences were found by ANOVA F(3,12)= 70.86, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001 (B) and ANOVA F(3,54)= 20.65, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 ***, p<0.001 (C). (D) Proteasome activity was assessed by measuring the hydrolysis of fluorogenic suc-LLVY-AMC (12.5 μM) by purified human proteasomes (10 nM) in the absence and presence of sarkosyl-soluble or -insoluble fractions from whole-cell lysates of TDP43-Q331K-overexpressing HEK293 cells. Time-dependent increase in activity of purified proteasomes (black circles) was completely inhibited by incubation with MG132 (black squares). Incubation of proteasomes with the sarkosyl soluble fraction of TDP-43 expressing HEK293 cells led to a modest reduction in proteasome activity (blue triangles) that was not statistically significant. Incubation of proteasomes with the sarkosyl insoluble fraction of TDP-43 expressing HEK293 cells led to a robust reduction in proteasome activity (red triangles) that was statistically significant. (E) Quantification of proteasome activity at the 60 minute time point reveals groups differences by ANOVA (F(3,8)=72.8, p<0.0001). The post hoc analysis shows that the proteasome activity in the sarkosyl-insoluble treated samples was statistically significantly reduced in comparison with proteasomes untreated with cell lysates (***, p<0.0001) or treated with sarkosyl-soluble lysates (**, p<0.001). Exact p values and confidence intervals are summarized in Supplementary Figure 7. (F) Affinity purified 26S proteasomes contain PSMD4, PSMA4, PSMB6 and RAD23A (by immunoblots) while 20S proteasome lack RAD23A. (Gi) Whole cell lysate (WCL) from the brain of WT and TAR4/4 animals treated with SCR or RAD23A targeting ASO were assayed for proteasomal protease activity using the LLVY peptide. There is reduced protease activity in the TAR4/4 SCR ASO treated mice in comparison with the other experimental groups. Group differences were found by ANOVA F(3,53)= 30.13, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 *, P,0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001. (Gii) Quantification of brain lysate protease activity using the RPPGFSAFK peptide. Group differences were found by ANOVA F(3,44)= 21.0, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 **, p<0.01. (Giii) Quantification of brain lysate protease activity using the KKVAPYPME peptide. Group differences were found by ANOVA F(3,54)= 20.65, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 *, P,0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001. (H) Immunoblots for proteasome components (e.g., PSMA3, PSMC3 and PSMC5) in the soluble and insoluble fractions of WT and TAR4/4 brain lysates treated with SCR or RAD23A targeting ASO. In WT animals proteasome components are predominantly found in the soluble fraction and ASO treatments do not affect their abundance. In contrast, in the TAR4/4 mice, the abundance of the proteasome subunits in the insoluble fraction is increased (in comparison with WT). ASO targeting rad23 reduces (in comparison with SCR control) the partitioning of proteasome subunits into the insoluble fraction. (I) Quantification of the PSMA3 abundance in the insoluble fraction. Group differences were found by ANOVA F(3,12)= 32.92, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001. (J) Quantification of the PSMC3 abundance in the insoluble fraction. Group differences were found by ANOVA F(3,12)= 42.15, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001. (K) Quantification of the PSMC5 abundance in the insoluble fraction. Group differences were found by ANOVA F(3,12)= 19.65, p<0.0001, post hoc analysis: ***, p<0.001 **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001. (L) Immunoblots of immunoprecipitated material from cells expressing epitope tagged A315T hTDP-43, RAD23A or ubiquitin. The results from IP with antibodies to the epitope tagged protein were compared with IP using a control IgG from the same species. Cell were treated with MG132 or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide - DMSO), or MG132. Input (10% of initial material) reveals the presence of the transgene and all the interrogated proteins. IP’ed TDP-43 (with anti-FLAG) pulls down TDP-43 but no RAD23A (probing with either anti-V5 or -RAD23A). MG132 leads to a high molecular weight smear in the anti-ubiquitin blot (using anti-HA) which likely represents ubiquitinated TDP-43. IP’ed RAD23A (with anti-V5) pulls down RAD23A (using anti-V5 or -RAD23A. With a long exposure there is a faint TDP-43 band in the (blotting with anti-FLAG or -TDP-43) in the MG132 treated cells. The molecular weight of this band corresponds to non-ubiquitinated TDP-43. IP’ed ubiquitin (with anti-HA) pulls down ubiquitin and TDP-43 but not RAD23A and MG132 increases the ubiquitin and TDP-43 signal.