Cognitive activity significantly affects the dynamic cerebral autoregulation, but not the dynamic vasoreactivity, in healthy adults
- PMID: 39314625
- PMCID: PMC11417032
- DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1350832
Cognitive activity significantly affects the dynamic cerebral autoregulation, but not the dynamic vasoreactivity, in healthy adults
Abstract
Introduction: Neurovascular coupling (NVC) is an important mechanism for the regulation of cerebral perfusion during intensive cognitive activity. Thus, it should be examined in terms of its effects on the regulation dynamics of cerebral perfusion and its possible alterations during cognitive impairment. The dynamic dependence of continuous changes in cerebral blood velocity (CBv), which can be measured noninvasively using transcranial Doppler upon fluctuations in arterial blood pressure (ABP) and CO2 tension, using end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) as a proxy, can be quantified via data-based dynamic modeling to yield insights into two key regulatory mechanisms: the dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and dynamic vasomotor reactivity (DVR), respectively.
Methods: Using the Laguerre Expansion Technique (LET), this study extracted such models from data in supine resting vs cognitively active conditions (during attention, fluency, and memory tasks from the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III, ACE-III) to elucidate possible changes in dCA and DVR due to cognitive stimulation of NVC. Healthy volunteers (n = 39) were recruited at the University of Leicester and continuous measurements of CBv, ABP, and EtCO2 were recorded.
Results: Modeling analysis of the dynamic ABP-to-CBv and CO2-to-CBv relationships showed significant changes in dCA, but not DVR, under cognitively active conditions compared to resting state.
Discussion: Interpretation of these changes through Principal Dynamic Mode (PDM) analysis is discussed in terms of possible associations between stronger NVC stimulation during cognitive tasks and enhanced sympathetic activation.
Keywords: cerebral blood velocity; dynamic cerebral autoregulation; dynamic vasomotor reactivity; neurovascular coupling; transcranial doppler ultrasonography.
Copyright © 2024 Rizko, Beishon, Panerai and Marmarelis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Data-based modeling of cerebral hemodynamics quantifies impairment of cerebral blood flow regulation in type-2 diabetes.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024 Nov;44(11):1288-1301. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241254716. Epub 2024 May 15. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024. PMID: 38748923 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative representation of neural activation in multivariate models of neurovascular coupling in humans.J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):833-843. doi: 10.1152/jn.00175.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 26. J Neurophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31242062
-
The assessment of neurovascular coupling with the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination: a functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonographic study.J Neurophysiol. 2018 Mar 1;119(3):1084-1094. doi: 10.1152/jn.00698.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 29. J Neurophysiol. 2018. PMID: 29187557
-
Quantification of dynamic cerebral autoregulation and CO2 dynamic vasomotor reactivity impairment in essential hypertension.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Feb 1;128(2):397-409. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00620.2019. Epub 2020 Jan 9. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020. PMID: 31917625 Free PMC article.
-
Functional TCD: regulation of cerebral hemodynamics--cerebral autoregulation, vasomotor reactivity, and neurovascular coupling.Front Neurol Neurosci. 2015;36:40-56. doi: 10.1159/000366236. Epub 2014 Dec 22. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 25531662 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous