Imaging for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis: can artificial intelligence improve diagnostic performance?
- PMID: 39314764
- PMCID: PMC11417618
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1408574
Imaging for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis: can artificial intelligence improve diagnostic performance?
Abstract
Myocarditis is a cardiovascular disease characterised by inflammation of the heart muscle which can lead to heart failure. There is heterogeneity in the mode of presentation, underlying aetiologies, and clinical outcome with impact on a wide range of age groups which lead to diagnostic challenges. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the preferred imaging modality in the diagnostic work-up of those with acute myocarditis. There is a need for systematic analytical approaches to improve diagnosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly used in CMR and has been shown to match human diagnostic performance in multiple disease categories. In this review article, we will describe the role of CMR in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis followed by a literature review on the applications of AI and ML to diagnose acute myocarditis. Only a few papers were identified with limitations in cases and control size and a lack of detail regarding cohort characteristics in addition to the absence of relevant cardiovascular disease controls. Furthermore, often CMR datasets did not include contemporary tissue characterisation parameters such as T1 and T2 mapping techniques, which are central to the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Future work may include the use of explainability tools to enhance our confidence and understanding of the machine learning models with large, better characterised cohorts and clinical context improving the diagnosis of acute myocarditis.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; cardiac MRI; diagnosis; machine learning; myocarditis.
© 2024 Shyam-Sundar, Harding, Khan, Abdulkareem, Slabaugh, Mohiddin, Petersen and Aung.
Conflict of interest statement
GS is a scientiific adviser to BioAiHealth. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
