Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 17:10:20552076241280126.
doi: 10.1177/20552076241280126. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Clinical decision support systems for 3-month mortality in elderly patients admitted to ICU with ischemic stroke using interpretable machine learning

Affiliations

Clinical decision support systems for 3-month mortality in elderly patients admitted to ICU with ischemic stroke using interpretable machine learning

Jian Huang et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: Elderly patients are more likely to suffer from severe ischemic stroke (IS) and have worse outcomes, including death and disability. We aimed to develop and validate predictive models using novel machine learning algorithms for the 3-month mortality in elderly patients with IS admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Data were extracted from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry (INSPIRE) database. Ten machine learning algorithms including Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NN), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNNs), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Naive Bayes (NB), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Logistic Regression (LR) were used to build the models. Performance was measured using area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy. Finally, interpretable machine learning (IML) models presenting as Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were applied for mortality risk prediction.

Results: A total of 1826 elderly patients with IS admitted to the ICU were included in the analysis, of whom 624 (34.2%) died, and endovascular treatment was performed in 244 patients. After feature selection, a total of eight variables, including minimum Glasgow Coma Scale values, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, age, alkaline phosphatase, body mass index, platelets, and types of surgery, were finally used for model construction. The AUCs of the CatBoost model were 0.737 in the testing set and 0.709 in the external validation set. The Brier scores in the training set and testing set were 0.12 and 0.21, respectively. The IML of the CatBoost model was performed based on the SHAP value and the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations method.

Conclusion: The CatBoost model had the best predictive performance for predicting mortality in elderly patients with IS admitted to the ICU. The IML model would further aid in clinical decision-making and timely healthcare services by the early identification of high-risk patients.

Keywords: Prediction model; elderly patients; hospital mortality; ischemic stroke; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Flow diagram of the study population. (b) Model development and performance comparison.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
ROC curve of model. (a) AUC values of all models in the training set. (b) AUC values for all models in the testing set.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Assessment of CatBoost model. (a) The calibration plot of model in the training set. (b) The calibration plot of model in the testing set. (c) The DCA curve of model in the training set. (d) The DCA curve of model in the testing set.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(a/b) SHAP summary plot for the eight clinical features contributing to model prediction for mortality, GCS min, LDH, type, albumin, age, ALP, platelets, and BMI. (c/d) SHAP explanation force plot for two patients from the held-out testing set of the ML model.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The level of the feature corresponds to the SHAP value. (a) GCS min, (b) ALP, (c) albumin, (d) LDH, (e) age.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Katan M, Luft A. Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol 2018; 38: 208–211. - PubMed
    1. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, et al. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 43–53. - PubMed
    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 2008; 117: e25–146. - PubMed
    1. Powell JL, Cook IG. Global ageing in comparative perspective: a critical discussion. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 2009; 29: 388–400.
    1. Béjot Y. Forty years of descriptive epidemiology of stroke. Neuroepidemiology 2022; 56: 157–162. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources