Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 27:11:e74.
doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.71. eCollection 2024.

Digital mental health interventions for treating mental disorders in young people based in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the literature

Janagan Alagarajah  1 , Diana Ceccolini  2 , Sydney Butler  3
Affiliations
Review

Digital mental health interventions for treating mental disorders in young people based in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the literature

Janagan Alagarajah et al. Glob Ment Health (Camb). .

Abstract

Young people (YP) (between 10 and 24 years) are disproportionally vulnerable to developing and being affected by mental health conditions due to physical, social and emotional risk factors. YP in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have poorer access to, and quality of, mental health services compared to those in high-income countries. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have been proposed as tools to address this burden of disease and reduce the global treatment gap in youth mental health outcomes. This study aimed to examine the evidence for DMHIs for treating mental disorders in YP based in LMICs. To do this, the author searched academic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science) for primary studies on DMHIs targeting YP in LMICs. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria were followed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) framework. A narrative synthesis methodology was used to summarise and explain the findings. The authors identified 287 studies of which 7 were eligible in the final review. The authors found evidence of the effectiveness of multiple forms of DMHI (especially internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy) on anxiety and depression outcomes. Studies reported a lack of long-term benefits of treatment, high dropout rates, and did not include key geographical settings or data on cost-effectiveness. No studies were judged to be of high quality. This review highlights the available evidence showing that DMHIs can improve mental health outcomes for YP in LMICs, but due to the limited number of studies and lack of high-quality data, increased adoption and scaling up of digital interventions require more rigorous studies showing clinical effectiveness and ability to provide return on investment.

Keywords: digital mental health interventions; global mental health; low- and middle-income countries; systematic review; young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare none.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andrews G, Basu A, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, English CL and Newby JM (2018) Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 55, 70–78. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angold A and Costello EJ (1993) Depressive comorbidity in children and adolescents: Empirical, theoretical, and methodological issues. American Journal of Psychiatry 150(12), 1779–1791. 10.1176/ajp.150.12.1779. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avenevoli S, Swendsen J, He JP, Burstein M and Merikangas KR (2015) Major depression in the National Comorbidity Survey–Adolescent Supplement: Prevalence, correlates, and treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 54(1), 37–44. 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.10.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumel A, Edan S and Kane JM (2019) Is there a trial bias impacting user engagement with unguided e-mental health interventions? A systematic comparison of published reports and real-world usage of the same programs. Translational Behavioral Medicine 9(6), 1020–1033. 10.1093/tbm/ibz147. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker AE and Kleinman A (2013) Mental health and the global agenda. The New England Journal of Medicine 369(1), 66–73. 10.1056/NEJMra1110827. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources