Trait-level predictors of human performance outcomes in personnel engaged in stressful laboratory and field tasks
- PMID: 39315045
- PMCID: PMC11418282
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1449200
Trait-level predictors of human performance outcomes in personnel engaged in stressful laboratory and field tasks
Abstract
Introduction: Personnel performance under stress hinges on various factors, including individual traits, training, context, mental and physiological states, and task demands. This study explored the link between the traits of military personnel and their performance outcomes in five domains: move, shoot, communicate, navigate, and sustain.
Methods: A total of 387 U.S. Army soldiers participated in this study, undergoing trait assessments covering physical, cognitive, social-emotional, demographic/lifestyle, and health domains. Performance was measured through lab and field events assessing a broad range of individual and team-level skills under conditions demanding resilience to acute cognitive and physical stress exposure. Analysis used feature selection and elastic net regression.
Results: Analyses revealed complex associations between traits and performance, with physical, cognitive, health-related, social-emotional, and lifestyle traits playing roles in guiding and constraining performance. Measures of resilience, emotion regulation, grit, and mindfulness were identified as relevant predictors of several performance-related outcomes.
Discussion: Results carry implications for the selection, training, and operational effectiveness of personnel in high-stakes occupations including military and first response. Further research is necessary to explore the mechanisms underlying these associations and inform targeted interventions to boost personnel effectiveness.
Keywords: decision making; emotion; machine learning; memory; military perception; performance; prediction; traits.
Copyright © 2024 Brunyé, Goring, Cantelon, Eddy, Elkin-Frankston, Elmore, Giles, Hancock, Masud, McIntyre, McKenzie, Mitchell, O’Donovan, Racicot and Ramsay.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
References
-
- Araújo D., Davids K., Passos P. (2007). Ecological validity, representative design, and correspondence between experimental task constraints and behavioral setting: comment on. Ecol. Psychol. 19, 69–78. doi: 10.1080/10407410709336951 - DOI
-
- Arra K., Gunda Y. R., Gupta S. (2023). Development of a predictive model for workers’ involvement in workplace accidents in an underground coal mine. Sādhanā 48:63. doi: 10.1007/s12046-023-02121-3 - DOI
-
- Bartone P. T., Roland R. R., Picano J. J., Williams T. J. (2008). Psychological hardiness predicts success in US Army special forces candidates. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 16, 78–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00412.x - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
