Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 9:15:1450334.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450334. eCollection 2024.

Development and validation of the job stressor scale for specialty nurses

Affiliations

Development and validation of the job stressor scale for specialty nurses

Panpan Zhang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Specialty nurses play a crucial role in specialized nursing practice, teaching, management, and research. These nurses often face significant work pressure; therefore, scientifically and effectively assessing their job stress and its sources is vital for enhancing the quality of their work. However, there is currently a dearth of verified assessment tools for measuring job stressors among specialty nurses. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and test an instrument to assess the job stressors applicable to specialty nurses.

Methods: We conducted a multiphase mixed-methods study. The initial scale items were developed from a literature review and structured interviews. The scale was then refined through two rounds of expert consultation (N = 14) and a primary test (N = 20). A main survey (N = 552) was then conducted to evaluate the scale's construct validity and reliability using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).

Results: The final scale comprises four dimensions with 27 items. The factors included "specialized nursing and work," "workload and time allocation," "patient care," and "work resources and environment." The EFA explained 69.10% of the variance, while the CFA confirmed a good model fit. The content validity index was 0.980 at the scale level and 0.790-1.000 at the item level. The scale's reliability was supported by its high Cronbach's α (0.958), test-retest reliability (0.946), and split-half reliability (0.868).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the job stressor scale developed in this study is valid and reliable, and is recommended for use among specialty nurses to assess their stressors.

Keywords: development; evaluation; nurses; scale; specialties; stressor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural validity of confirmatory factor analysis. A1–A27 represent scale items, while e1–e27 represent residuals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bailey J. T., Steffen S. M., Grout J. W. (1980). The stress audit: identifying the stressors of ICU nursing. J. Nurs. Educ. 19, 15–25. - PubMed
    1. Chen Y. C., Guo Y. L., Lin L. C., Lee Y. J., Hu P. Y., Ho J. J., et al. . (2020). Development of the Nurses' occupational stressor scale. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020649, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein R. A. (1983). Global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colaizzi P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    1. Ding Y. M., Wu X. J., Tian J. Y., Zhang P. Y., Xiao Y. Y., Wang X. Y. (2021). The current situation of the cultivation and development of specialty nurses in tertiary hospitals in China. Chin. J. Nurs. 56, 1357–1362. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.09.013 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources