Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Sep 9:14:1437704.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1437704. eCollection 2024.

Head-to-head comparison of two human papillomavirus vaccines for efficacy against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ-population-based follow-up of two cluster-randomized trials

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Head-to-head comparison of two human papillomavirus vaccines for efficacy against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ-population-based follow-up of two cluster-randomized trials

Matti Lehtinen et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Introduction: We report head-to-head comparison of the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccine efficacies against immediate precursors of cervical cancer from 15 years' country-wide cancer registry follow-up of phase III trial cohorts and an age-aligned cohort of unvaccinated women.

Methods: These individually and/or clusterrandomized cohorts of HPV6/11/16/18- and HPV16/18-vaccinated and unvaccinated women were enrolled, respectively, in 2002, 2004, and 2003/2005. The trial cohorts comprised initially 16- to 17-year-old HPV6/11/16/18-vaccinated FUTURE II (NCT00092534) participants (866) and HPV16/18-vaccinated PATRICIA (NCT00122681) and 012 trial (NCT00169494) participants (2,465), and 16,526 initially 16- to 19-year-old unvaccinated controls. After active 4-year clinical follow-up, passive, country-wide Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) follow-up for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) was based on consented use of unique personal identifiers and started 6 months after the end of the FUTURE II and PATRICIA trials in 2007 and 2009, and ended at the end of 2019. The follow-up with altogether 229,020 follow-up years was age-aligned to ensure that similarly aged cohorts were passively followed up for 15 years post=vaccination for the intention-to-treat analyses of vaccine efficacy.

Results: Overall, we identified 5 and 16 CIN3 (no AIS) cases in the HPV6/11/16/18 and HPV16/18 cohorts, respectively, during the FCR-based follow-up. In the unvaccinated cohort, we identified 281 CIN3 cases, 20 AIS cases, and 13 cases with invasive cervical cancer. Vaccine efficacies against CIN3+ were 68.4% and 64.5% for the quadrivalent and the bivalent vaccines, respectively, with overlapping confidence intervals.

Discussion: Long-term follow-up of randomized, initially adolescent HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts shows, in this head-to-head setting, that the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines are equally effective against immediate precursors of cervical cancer.

Keywords: cervical neoplasia; follow-up; human papillomavirus; randomized trial; vaccine efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DA, JD, ML, and JPaa have received grants for their HPV vaccination studies from Merck&Co. Inc. DA, JD, ML, and JPaa and GSK Biologicals DA, ML, JPaa. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neutralizing human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and type 18 antibody levels (International Units, IU/mL) in women vaccinated with three doses of the quadrivalent (HPV6/11/16/18) (●) or bivalent (HPV16/18) (●) vaccines at age 16 to 17 years. Upper margins of the lowest quartiles by vaccine are marked with dotted lines. Spearman (rs) correlation between HPV16 and HPV18 antibody levels in the lowest quartile by vaccine (rsquadrivalent = 0.3, rsbivalent = 0.3).

References

    1. Arnheim L., Pasternak B., Svanström A., Sparen P., Hviid A. (2013). Autoimmune, neuro- logical, and venous thromboembolic adverse events after immunisation of adolescent girls with quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in Denmark and Sweden. BMJ 347, f5906. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arroyo S., Eklund C., Lagheden C., Eriksson T., Pimenoff V., Gray P., et al. . (2022). Head-to-head comparison of type-specific peak pseudovirion antibody levels induced by three doses of the bivalent vs. nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccines. J. Infect. Dis. 226, 1195–1199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Artemchuk H., Eriksson T., Poljak M., Surcel H.-M., Dillner J., Lehtinen M., et al. . (2019). Long-term seroresponse to human papillomavirus vaccines. Up to 12 years follow-up in the Finnish Maternity Cohort. J. Infect. Dis. 219, 582–589. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy545 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eriksson T., Torvinen S., Lehtinen M. M., Huhtala H., Paavonen J., Rissanen P., et al. . (2013). Impact of HPV16/18 vaccination on quality of life. Eur. J. Contracept. Reproduct. Health Care 18, 364–371. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.801953 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ewell M. (1996). Comparing methods for calculating confidence intervals for vaccine efficacy. Stat. Med. 15, 2379–2392. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances