Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 1;100(3):358-374.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005886. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

Assessment Tools for Patient Notes in Medical Education: A Scoping Review

Assessment Tools for Patient Notes in Medical Education: A Scoping Review

William F Kelly et al. Acad Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: Physician proficiency in clinical encounter documentation is a universal expectation of medical education. However, deficiencies in note writing are frequently identified, which have implications for patient safety, health care quality, and cost. This study aimed to create a compendium of tools for educators' practical implementation or future research.

Method: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed, Embase, Ovid All EBM Reviews, Web of Science, and MedEdPORTAL were searched for articles published from database inception to November 16, 2023, using the following search terms: documentation, note-writing, patient note, electronic health record note, entrustable professional activity 5 , and other terms. For each note-writing assessment tool, information on setting, section(s) of note that was assessed, tool properties, numbers and roles of note writers and graders, weight given, if used in grading, learner performance, and stakeholder satisfaction and feasibility was extracted and summarized.

Results: A total of 5,257 articles were identified; 32 studies with unique tools were included in the review. Eleven studies (34.4%) were published since 2018. Twenty-two studies (68.8%) outlined creating an original assessment tool, whereas 10 (31.2%) assessed a curriculum intervention using a tool. Tools varied in length and complexity. None provided data on equity or fairness to student or resident note writers or about readability for patients. Note writers often had missing or incomplete documentation (mean [SD] total tool score of 60.3% [19.4%] averaged over 25 studies), often improving after intervention. Selected patient note assessment tool studies have been cited a mean (SD) of 6.3 (9.2) times. Approximately half of the tools (17 [53.1%]) or their accompanying articles were open access.

Conclusions: Diverse tools have been published to assess patient notes, often identifying deficiencies. This compendium may assist educators and researchers in improving patient care documentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weed LL. The importance of medical records. Can Fam Physician. 1969;15(12):23–25.
    1. Campanella P, Lovato E, Marone C, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26(1):60–64.
    1. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Published March 2023. Accessed August 19, 2024. https://lcme.org/publications/
    1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Internal Medicine. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresid...
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ambulatory Care Use and Physician Office Visits. Accessed June 12, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/physician-visits.htm

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources