Assessment Tools for Patient Notes in Medical Education: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 39316464
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005886
Assessment Tools for Patient Notes in Medical Education: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Purpose: Physician proficiency in clinical encounter documentation is a universal expectation of medical education. However, deficiencies in note writing are frequently identified, which have implications for patient safety, health care quality, and cost. This study aimed to create a compendium of tools for educators' practical implementation or future research.
Method: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed, Embase, Ovid All EBM Reviews, Web of Science, and MedEdPORTAL were searched for articles published from database inception to November 16, 2023, using the following search terms: documentation, note-writing, patient note, electronic health record note, entrustable professional activity 5 , and other terms. For each note-writing assessment tool, information on setting, section(s) of note that was assessed, tool properties, numbers and roles of note writers and graders, weight given, if used in grading, learner performance, and stakeholder satisfaction and feasibility was extracted and summarized.
Results: A total of 5,257 articles were identified; 32 studies with unique tools were included in the review. Eleven studies (34.4%) were published since 2018. Twenty-two studies (68.8%) outlined creating an original assessment tool, whereas 10 (31.2%) assessed a curriculum intervention using a tool. Tools varied in length and complexity. None provided data on equity or fairness to student or resident note writers or about readability for patients. Note writers often had missing or incomplete documentation (mean [SD] total tool score of 60.3% [19.4%] averaged over 25 studies), often improving after intervention. Selected patient note assessment tool studies have been cited a mean (SD) of 6.3 (9.2) times. Approximately half of the tools (17 [53.1%]) or their accompanying articles were open access.
Conclusions: Diverse tools have been published to assess patient notes, often identifying deficiencies. This compendium may assist educators and researchers in improving patient care documentation.
Copyright © 2024 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Patient Online Record Access on Documentation: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 20;27:e64762. doi: 10.2196/64762. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 39977853 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Medical Student Surgery Notes Through Near-Peer Targeted Education: A Qualitative Analysis.J Surg Res. 2025 Apr;308:224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.035. Epub 2025 Mar 21. J Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40120527
-
Writing Practices Associated With Electronic Progress Notes and the Preferences of Those Who Read Them: Descriptive Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 6;23(10):e30165. doi: 10.2196/30165. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34612825 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Documentation Due to Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 28;12:e46722. doi: 10.2196/46722. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 37639298 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Enhancing Resident Note Documentation: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Accurately Capture Patient Complexity.Am J Med Open. 2025 May 19;14:100104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100104. eCollection 2025 Dec. Am J Med Open. 2025. PMID: 40574737 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weed LL. The importance of medical records. Can Fam Physician. 1969;15(12):23–25.
-
- Campanella P, Lovato E, Marone C, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26(1):60–64.
-
- Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Published March 2023. Accessed August 19, 2024. https://lcme.org/publications/
-
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Internal Medicine. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresid...
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ambulatory Care Use and Physician Office Visits. Accessed June 12, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/physician-visits.htm
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources