Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e087193.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087193.

Feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (FIBROPANC): protocol for a multicentre, single-arm trial

Affiliations

Feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (FIBROPANC): protocol for a multicentre, single-arm trial

J Annelie Suurmeijer et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurs in 25% of patients undergoing a high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and is a driving cause of major morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stay and increased costs after PD. There is a need for perioperative methods to decrease these risks. In recent studies, preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) reduced the rate of POPF seemingly due to radiation-induced pancreatic fibrosis. However, patients with a high risk of POPF mostly have a non-pancreatic periampullary tumour and do not receive radiotherapy. Prospective studies using radiotherapy specifically to reduce the risk of POPF have not been performed. We aim to assess the safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the rate of POPF.

Methods and analysis: In this multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial, we aim to assess the feasibility and safety of a single fraction of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (12 Gy) to a 4 cm area around the future pancreatic neck transection margin in patients at high risk of developing POPF after PD aimed to reduce the risk of grade B/C POPF. Adult patients scheduled for PD for malignant and premalignant periampullary tumours, excluding PDAC, with a pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm will be included in centres participating in the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. The primary outcome is the safety and feasibility of single-dose preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy before PD. The most relevant secondary outcomes are grade B/C POPF and the difference in the extent of fibrosis between the radiated and non-radiated (uncinate margin) pancreas. Evaluation of endpoints will be performed after inclusion of 33 eligible patients.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained by the Amsterdam UMC's accredited Medical Research Ethics Committee (METC). All included patients are required to have provided written informed consent. The results of this trial will be used to determine the need for a randomised controlled phase III trial and submitted to a high-impact peer-reviewed medical journal regardless of the study outcome.

Trial registration number: NL72913 (Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects Registry) and NCT05641233 (ClinicalTrials).

Keywords: clinical trials; hepatobiliary disease; pancreatic disease; pancreatic surgery; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Single fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy will be targeted at 4 cm around the future pancreatic neck transection margin.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Durometer (Rex Gauge Company, USA) set up to assess firmness of radiated and non-radiated pancreatic tissue.

References

    1. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017;161:584–91. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang J, Ma R, Churilov L, et al. The cost of perioperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review. Pancreatology. 2018;18:208–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mackay TM, Wellner UF, van Rijssen LB, et al. Variation in pancreatoduodenectomy as delivered in two national audits. Br J Surg. 2019;106:747–55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smits FJ, Henry AC, Besselink MG, et al. Algorithm-based care versus usual care for the early recognition and management of complications after pancreatic resection in the Netherlands: an open-label, nationwide, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1867–75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00182-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suurmeijer JA, Henry AC, Bonsing BA, et al. Outcome of Pancreatic Surgery During the First 6 Years of a Mandatory Audit Within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Ann Surg. 2023;278:260–6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005628. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data