Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;95(1):197-218.
doi: 10.1111/bjep.12716. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice

Affiliations

Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice

Susanne Narciss et al. Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aims: Although errors and failures are indispensable parts of the learning process, the current theoretical models and empirical research remain inadequate to provide a comprehensive perspective for learning from errors, considering the roles of different agents, settings, and support mechanisms. Addressing these gaps in the literature, this special issue collects 11 research papers related to learning from errors and failure in educational contexts. In this commentary, we synthesize the findings of these papers with previous work, address conceptual and methodological challenges based on these papers and their implications, and provide suggestions to enhance educational practices.

Results: The special issue papers varying in regard to research design, subject domain, participants, and learning setting presented findings about four main themes: (1) contextual factors (e.g. organization and error climate) as an enabler and barrier, (2) individual factors (e.g. motivational beliefs and emotions) in learners' processing of errors, (3) error- or failure-related learning processes, and (4) instructional strategies (e.g. feedback and prompts) to support learning from errors. Critical evaluation of these papers also revealed conceptual (e.g. error vs. failure) and methodological (e.g. generic vs. error-specific measures and instruments) challenges, which also paved the way for directions for future research.

Conclusion: Overall, 11 papers in this special issue provide significant empirical evidence about learning from errors and failure in educational contexts. Synthesizing the findings of both these papers and prior research, we also present suggestions to construct an educational environment conducive to learning from errors.

Keywords: erroneous example; error climate; instructional support; learning from errors; learning from failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overview of components of a supportive error climate in educational contexts.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adams, D. M. , McLaren, B. M. , Durkin, K. , Mayer, R. E. , Rittle‐Johnson, B. , Isotani, S. , & van Velsen, M. (2014). Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web‐based tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 401–411. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.053 - DOI
    1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T - DOI
    1. Alemdag, E. , & Yildirim, Z. (2022a). Design and development of an online formative peer assessment environment with instructional scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 1359–1389. 10.1007/s11423-022-10115-x - DOI
    1. Alemdag, E. , & Yildirim, Z. (2022b). Effectiveness of online regulation scaffolds on peer feedback provision and uptake: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 188, 104574. 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 - DOI
    1. Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources