Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 23;11(3):e70002.
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70002. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections from open preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection: A systematic review of 91 randomized controlled trials and 5914 injections

Mohammad Sami Alazzeh  1 , Hamza Adnan Mohammad Naseh  1 , Angelo Vasiliadis  2 , Markus Laupheimer  3   4 , Georgios Kalifis  5 , Ayyoub Al-Dolaymi  1 , Luca Macchiarola  6 , Theodorakys Marín Fermín  5   7
Affiliations
Review

Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections from open preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection: A systematic review of 91 randomized controlled trials and 5914 injections

Mohammad Sami Alazzeh et al. J Exp Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the infection rate of intraarticular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) knee injections between open and closed techniques in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the last decade.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed, Scopus and Virtual Health Library were accessed in October 2022 using the terms 'platelet-rich plasma', 'PRP', 'knee' and 'tibiofemoral' alone and in combination with Boolean operators AND/OR. RCTs published during the last 10 years evaluating PRP intra-articular knee injections were considered eligible. Studies were excluded if the kit/preparation technique was not described. Data were presented using individual studies' absolute values, totals, and pooled percentages. Publication bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool.

Results: Ninety-one studies met the predetermined eligibility criteria. Forty-one implemented a closed technique, while 50 were open. All studies implementing a closed technique disclosed their commercial kits. Only 16 studies (17.58%) failed to report joint infections. Among the studies reporting joint infections as outcomes, 30 implemented a closed technique with 1195 patients, 1921 intra-articular knee injections and 95.44% of patient follow-up. On the other hand, 45 of them implemented an open technique with 2290 patients, 3993 intra-articular knee injections and 97.07% of patient follow-up. No patient had a joint infection among the included studies. Thirty-three studies prepared their PRP in controlled environments (36.26%). Most studies did not report where the preparation occurred (48.35%). Only twelve studies disclosed using laminar flow during preparation (13.19%). The infection rate for both techniques was 0 per 1000 knee injections.

Conclusion: Open PRP preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection and can lower manufacturing costs when appropriate facilities are available. However, PRP preparation setting and laminar flow implementation data are deficient, and minimal requirements for good manufacturing practices demand further studies while adhering to local and regional regulations.

Level of evidence: Level I, systematic review of RCTs.

Keywords: closed technique; good manufacturing practices; joint infection; laminar flow; open technique; orthobiologics; platelet‐rich plasma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Assessment of publication bias with ROBIS tool.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acosta‐Olivo, C. , Esponda‐Colmenares, F. , Vilchez‐Cavazos, F. , Lara‐Arias, J. , Mendoza‐Lemus, O. & Ramos‐Morales, T. (2014) Plasma rico en plaquetas versus paracetamol oral para el tratamiento de la osteoartrosis temprana de rodilla. Estudio preliminar [Platelet rich plasma versus oral paracetamol for the treatment of early knee osteoarthritis. Preliminary study]. Cirugia y cirujanos, 82(2), 163–169. - PubMed
    1. Alves, R. & Grimalt, R. (2018) A review of platelet‐rich plasma: history, biology, mechanism of action, and classification. Skin Appendage Disorders, 4(1), 18–24. Available from: 10.1159/000477353 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andia, I. & Maffulli, N. (2018) A contemporary view of platelet‐rich plasma therapies: moving toward refined clinical protocols and precise indications. Regenerative Medicine, 13(6), 717–728. Available from: 10.2217/rme-2018-0042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angoorani, H. , Mazaherinezhad, A. , Marjomaki, O. & Younespour, S. (2015) Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with platelet‐rich plasma in comparison with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation plus exercise: a randomized clinical trial. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 29, 223. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anz, A.W. , Hubbard, R. , Rendos, N.K. , Everts, P.A. , Andrews, J.R. & Hackel, J.G. (2020) Bone marrow aspirate concentrate is equivalent to platelet‐rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis at 1 year: a prospective, randomized trial. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 8(2), 2325967119900958. Available from: 10.1177/2325967119900958 - DOI - PMC - PubMed