Consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis from a Chinese multiple disciplinary team expert panel
- PMID: 39318749
- PMCID: PMC11419518
- DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000080
Consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis from a Chinese multiple disciplinary team expert panel
Abstract
Objective: To prepare a set of practice guidelines to standardize the entire process, from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up, for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis.
Methods: Thirty-six experts in the fields of digestive endoscopy, pancreatic surgery, interventional radiology, and others presented their opinions via discussions in online conferences by referring to the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcomes principles and then reviewed the evidence and statements using the Delphi method to reach a consensus. The consensus of >80% was finally achieved for the items.
Results: The experts discussed and reached a consensus on 29 statements including 10 categories: (1) definition and classification, (2) imaging and endoscopic diagnosis, (3) therapeutic implications, (4) surgical therapy, (5) percutaneous catheter drainage, (6) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, (7) EUS-guided drainage, (8) stent selection for EUS-guided drainage, (9) complication related to stents for cyst drainage, and (10) drug treatment and follow-up.
Conclusion: This consensus based on the clinical experience of experts in various fields and international evidence-based medicine further standardizes the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment processes for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis.
Keywords: Consensus; Diagnosis and treatment; Pancreatic pseudocyst; Walled-off necrosis.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Scholar Media Publishing.
Conflict of interest statement
Zhaoshen Li is an Honorary Editor-in-Chief of the journal, and Zhendong Jin is an Associate Editor-in-Chief. The article was subjected to the standard procedures of the journal, with a review process independent of the editors and their research group.
Figures
References
-
- Banks PA Bollen TL Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62(1):102–111. - PubMed
-
- Pancreas Study Group, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Pancreatology, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Digestion . Chinese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. (Shenyang, 2019). J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35(12): 2706–2711.
-
- Chinese Pancreatic Surgery Association, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association . Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis in China (2021). Chinese J Surg 2021;59(7):578–587. - PubMed
-
- Group of Pancreas Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association . Guidelines for the management of pancreatic cystic lesions (2015). J Clin Hepatol 2015;31(9):1375–1378.
-
- Jiang Z Zhan S Jia X, et al. The basic methods and procedures of develop/revise the clinical treatment guidelines. Natl Med J China 2016;96(4):250–253.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
