Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab compared with currently approved biologic drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
- PMID: 39320112
- DOI: 10.1002/phar.4611
Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab compared with currently approved biologic drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a serious health problem that requires a constant need to identify new effective drugs. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab compared with other biologic drugs approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC. This systematic review with frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the use of adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, mirikizumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab compared with placebo or with another approved biologic drug. The NMA was conducted using the netmeta R software package. The P score was used to determine the treatment ranking. A total of 14 RCTs were included in the analysis. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of clinical response and remission between mirikizumab and other drugs. Mirikizumab was superior to placebo for clinical response (induction: odds ratio [OR] = 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-3.48; maintenance: OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.59-6.89) and remission (induction: OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.20-3.63; maintenance: OR = 2.96; 95% CI: 1.62-5.40). The probability plot indicated that infliximab might be the most effective option in terms of both clinical response and remission (P score, 0.8971 and 0.8814, respectively) in induction phase. No significant differences were noted between the studied drugs in any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs) and infections for the induction phase, and in any AEs, infections and serious infections for the maintenance phase. The drugs differed in terms of discontinuation due to AEs (induction and maintenance phases) as well as SAEs and serious infections (maintenance phase). Mirikizumab did not differ from other biologics in terms of clinical response and remission for both induction and maintenance phases in patients with UC. Mirikizumab during the induction phases achieved rank 3 for clinical response and rank 5 for clinical remission. Therefore, it represents a valuable treatment option. The lack of significant differences in the risk of AEs and SAEs suggests that mirikizumab has a similar safety profile to the other drugs.
Keywords: efficacy; monoclonal antibodies; network meta‐analysis; safety; systematic review; ulcerative colitis.
© 2024 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Therapies in Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Adv Ther. 2024 Dec;41(12):4446-4462. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03003-8. Epub 2024 Oct 15. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID: 39404996 Free PMC article.
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):CD013206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013206.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32927498 Free PMC article.
-
Placebo response and remission rates in randomised trials of induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 8;9(9):CD011572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011572.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28886205 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of dupilumab versus newly approved biologics and JAKi in pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0319400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319400. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39992967 Free PMC article.
-
New Interleukin-23 Antagonists' Use in Crohn's Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;18(4):447. doi: 10.3390/ph18040447. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40283885 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Raine T, Bonovas S, Burisch J, et al. ECCO guidelines on therapeutics in ulcerative colitis: medical treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 2022;16(1):2‐17. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab178
-
- Moćko P, Kawalec P, Pilc A. Safety profile of biologic drugs in the therapy of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(8):870‐879. doi:10.1002/phar.1785
-
- Eder P, Łodyga M, Gawron‐Kiszka M, et al. Guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis. Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gastroenterology and the Polish National Consultant in Gastroenterology. Przegl Gastroenterol. 2023;18(1):1‐42. doi:10.5114/pg.2023.125882
-
- European Medicines Agency. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu‐EPAR/omvoh (Accessed: 2024.03.07).
-
- Food and Drug Administration. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov‐omvoh (Accessed: 2024.03.07).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical