Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 19;15(1):227.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01810-9.

Explainable breast cancer molecular expression prediction using multi-task deep-learning based on 3D whole breast ultrasound

Affiliations

Explainable breast cancer molecular expression prediction using multi-task deep-learning based on 3D whole breast ultrasound

Zengan Huang et al. Insights Imaging. .

Abstract

Objectives: To noninvasively estimate three breast cancer biomarkers, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and enhance performance and interpretability via multi-task deep learning.

Methods: The study included 388 breast cancer patients who received the 3D whole breast ultrasound system (3DWBUS) examinations at Xijing Hospital between October 2020 and September 2021. Two predictive models, a single-task and a multi-task, were developed; the former predicts biomarker expression, while the latter combines tumor segmentation with biomarker prediction to enhance interpretability. Performance evaluation included individual and overall prediction metrics, and Delong's test was used for performance comparison. The models' attention regions were visualized using Grad-CAM + + technology.

Results: All patients were randomly split into a training set (n = 240, 62%), a validation set (n = 60, 15%), and a test set (n = 88, 23%). In the individual evaluation of ER, PR, and HER2 expression prediction, the single-task and multi-task models achieved respective AUCs of 0.809 and 0.735 for ER, 0.688 and 0.767 for PR, and 0.626 and 0.697 for HER2, as observed in the test set. In the overall evaluation, the multi-task model demonstrated superior performance in the test set, achieving a higher macro AUC of 0.733, in contrast to 0.708 for the single-task model. The Grad-CAM + + method revealed that the multi-task model exhibited a stronger focus on diseased tissue areas, improving the interpretability of how the model worked.

Conclusion: Both models demonstrated impressive performance, with the multi-task model excelling in accuracy and offering improved interpretability on noninvasive 3DWBUS images using Grad-CAM + + technology.

Critical relevance statement: The multi-task deep learning model exhibits effective prediction for breast cancer biomarkers, offering direct biomarker identification and improved clinical interpretability, potentially boosting the efficiency of targeted drug screening.

Key points: Tumoral biomarkers are paramount for determining breast cancer treatment. The multi-task model can improve prediction performance, and improve interpretability in clinical practice. The 3D whole breast ultrasound system-based deep learning models excelled in predicting breast cancer biomarkers.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Deep learning; Ultrasound imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of patient recruitment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Neural network architecture (Conv, Convolutional Layer; BN, batch normalization layer; FC, fully connected layer)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Predicted probability of the single-task model for each breast biomarker in validation set (AC) and test set (DF). The prediction performances of the single-task model in the validation set and test set for each breast biomarker (GI)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Predicted probability of the multi-task model for each breast biomarker in validation set (AC) and test set (DF). The prediction performances of the multi-task model in the validation set and test set for each breast biomarker (GI)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Representative 3DWBUS images and the corresponding Grad-CAM + + heatmaps. The blue or red regions represent areas activated by the multi-task model with higher activation, while the purple regions represent those with lower activation
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Three-dimensional representation of the distribution of features extracted from the multi-task model for prediction of ER (plot A), PR (plot B), HER2 (plot C). Three-dimensional representation of the distribution of features extracted from the single-task model for prediction of ER (plot D), PR (plot E), HER2 (plot F)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mann RM, Hooley R, Barr RG, Moy L (2020) Novel approaches to screening for breast cancer. Radiology 297:266–285 - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI et al (2014) US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju055 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gamble P, Jaroensri R, Wang H et al (2021) Determining breast cancer biomarker status and associated morphological features using deep learning. Commun Med 1:14 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL (2018) Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 18:500–510 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang T, Tan T, Samperna R et al (2023) Radiomics and artificial intelligence in breast imaging: a survey. Artif Intell Rev. 10.1007/s10462-023-10543-y

LinkOut - more resources