Difference in the toxic effects of micro and nano ZnO particles on L. minor - an integrative approach
- PMID: 39320599
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-35133-5
Difference in the toxic effects of micro and nano ZnO particles on L. minor - an integrative approach
Abstract
The toxicity of nano-sized ZnO particles (nZnO) was evaluated and compared to that of their micro-sized counterparts (mZnO) using an integrative approach to investigate the mechanism of toxicity, utilizing duckweed (Lemna minor) as plant model. Following 7 days of exposure to nZnO or mZnO (2.5, 5, 25, and 50 mg L-1) growth rate, photosynthesis, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity parameters have been determined in duckweed. Phytotoxicity of both ZnO forms at relatively low concentrations was due to the release of free Zn ions into the nutrient media. However, the accumulation of Zn in plants treated with nZnO was significantly higher than in those treated with mZnO. Both mZnO and nZnO significantly reduced growth rate and impaired the functionality of the photosynthetic apparatus as evidenced by structural changes of chloroplasts, a decline in the efficiency of photosystem II, and chlorophyll a content. Additionally, exposure to mZnO and nZnO resulted in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), increased lipid peroxidation, the formation of carbonylated proteins, DNA damage, and alterations in antioxidant defense mechanisms. Overall, nZnO caused significantly stronger toxic effects than mZnO. The mechanism of nZnO toxicity to L. minor, as determined by multivariate statistical analysis, involved the disruption of primary photosynthetic reactions due to a redox imbalance in the cell caused by the enhanced absorption of Zn into plant tissues.
Keywords: Chlorophyll a fluorescence; Duckweed; Genotoxicity; Metal oxide particles; Oxidative stress; Ultrastructure.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3 - DOI
-
- Bevers S, Montaño MD, Rybicki L, Hofmann T, von der Kammer F, Ranville JF (2020) Quantification and characterization of nanoparticulate zinc in an urban watershed. Front Environ Sci 8:84. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00084 - DOI
-
- Bokhari SH, Ahmad I, Mahmood-Ul-Hassan M, Mohammad A (2016) Phytoremediation potential of Lemna minor L. for heavy metals. Int J Phytoremediation 18(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2015.1058331 - DOI
-
- Boxall A, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones A, Aitken R, Jefferson B, Watts C (2007) Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Technical Report. Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, UK.
-
- Caldelas C, Poitrasson F, Viers J, Araus JL (2020) Stable Zn isotopes reveal the uptake and toxicity of zinc oxide engineered nanomaterials in Phragmites australis. Environ Sci Nano 7:1927–1941. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EN00110D - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
