Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Nov 12;332(18):1525-1534.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.14745.

Fever Prevention in Patients With Acute Vascular Brain Injury: The INTREPID Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Fever Prevention in Patients With Acute Vascular Brain Injury: The INTREPID Randomized Clinical Trial

David M Greer et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Fever is associated with worse outcomes in patients with stroke, but whether preventing fever improves outcomes is unclear.

Objective: To determine whether fever prevention after acute vascular brain injury is achievable and impacts functional outcome.

Design, setting, and participants: Open-label randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment that enrolled 686 of 1176 planned critically ill patients with stroke at 43 intensive care units in 7 countries from March 2017 to April 2021 (last date of follow-up was May 12, 2022).

Intervention: Patients randomized to fever prevention (n = 339) were targeted to 37.0 °C for 14 days or intensive care unit discharge using an automated surface temperature management device. Standard care patients (n = 338) received standardized tiered fever treatment on occurrence of temperature of 38 °C or greater.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was daily mean fever burden: the area under the temperature curve above 37.9 °C (total fever burden) divided by the total number of hours in the acute phase, multiplied by 24 hours (°C-hour). The principal secondary outcome was 3-month functional recovery by shift analysis of the 6-category modified Rankin Scale, which is scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Major adverse events included death, pneumonia, sepsis, and malignant cerebral edema.

Results: Enrollment was stopped after a planned interim analysis demonstrated futility of the principal secondary end point. In total, 686 patients were enrolled, and 9 were consented but not randomized, leaving a primary analysis population of 677 patients (254 ischemic stroke, 223 intracerebral hemorrhage, 200 subarachnoid hemorrhage; 345 were female [51%]; median age, 62 years) with 433 (64%) completing the study through 12 months. Daily mean (SD) fever burden was significantly lower in the fever prevention group (0.37 [1.0] °C-hour; range, 0.0-8.0 °C-hour) compared with the standard care group (0.73 [1.1] °C-hour; range, 0.0-10.3 °C-hour) (difference, -0.35 [95% CI, -0.51 to -0.20]; P < .001). Between-group differences for the primary outcome by stroke subtype were -0.10 (95% CI, -0.35 to 0.15) for ischemic stroke, -0.50 (95% CI, -0.78 to -0.22) for intracerebral hemorrhage, and -0.52 (95% CI, -0.81 to -0.23) for subarachnoid hemorrhage (all P < .001 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test). There was no significant difference in functional recovery at 3 months (median modified Rankin Scale score, 4.0 vs 4.0, respectively; odds ratio for a favorable shift in functional outcome, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.46]; P = .54). Major adverse events occurred in 82.2% of participants in the fever prevention group vs 75.9% in the standard care group, including 33.8% vs 34.5% for infections, 14.5% vs 14.0% for cardiac disorders, and 24.5% vs 20.5% for respiratory disorders.

Conclusions and relevance: In patients with acute vascular brain injury, preventive normothermia using an automated surface temperature management device effectively reduced fever burden but did not improve functional outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02996266.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Helbok reported receiving teaching fees and travel support from Zoll Medical and Becton, Dickinson and Company during the conduct of the study and teaching fees and travel support from Integra and Neuroptics outside the submitted work. Dr Badjatia reported receiving grants from Maryland Industrial Partnerships outside the submitted work. Dr Sheth reported receiving grants from Bard to Yale during the conduct of the study and grants from Hyperfine and Biogen to Yale, and grants from the National Institutes of Health and American Heart Association; serving on the advisory board from Astrocyte; consulting for CSL Behring, Bexorg, Rhaeos, and BrainQ; serving on the data and safety monitoring boards for Sense DSMB and Phillips; and being cofounder of Alva Health outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Enrollment and Randomization of Patients in the INTREPID Study
INTREPID indicates Impact of Fever Prevention in Brain Injured Patients; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage. aIt is unknown how many potential patients were approached as patients prescreened for eligibility were site reported. bNot treated are those patients who were randomized to a treatment group but subsequently discontinued from the study prior to the start of the acute study phase.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Average Hourly Fever Burden
In panel B, the solid horizontal lines indicate the hourly mean fever burden for each group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Shift Analysis at 3 Months
Modified Rankin Scale shift analysis at 3 months shows no difference in functional outcome between groups. The mRS is scored from 0 to 6, with 0 representing no symptoms; 1, no significant disability; 2, minimal disability; 3, moderate disability; 4, severe disability and inability to ambulate without assistance; 5, severe disability; and 6, death.

Comment on

References

    1. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marion DW. Controlled normothermia in neurologic intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(2)(suppl):S43-S45. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000110731.69637.16 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kammersgaard LP, Jørgensen HS, Rungby JA, et al. Admission body temperature predicts long-term mortality after acute stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1759-1762. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000019910.90280.F1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reith J, Jørgensen HS, Pedersen PM, et al. Body temperature in acute stroke: relation to stroke severity, infarct size, mortality, and outcome. Lancet. 1996;347(8999):422-425. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90008-2 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data