Effects of one session of theta or high alpha neurofeedback on EEG activity and working memory
- PMID: 39322825
- DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01218-4
Effects of one session of theta or high alpha neurofeedback on EEG activity and working memory
Abstract
Neurofeedback techniques provide participants immediate feedback on neuronal signals, enabling them to modulate their brain activity. This technique holds promise to unveil brain-behavior relationship and offers opportunities for neuroenhancement. Establishing causal relationships between modulated brain activity and behavioral improvements requires rigorous experimental designs, including appropriate control groups and large samples. Our primary objective was to examine whether a single neurofeedback session, designed to enhance working memory through the modulation of theta or high-alpha frequencies, elicits specific changes in electrophysiological and cognitive outcomes. Additionally, we explored predictors of successful neuromodulation. A total of 101 healthy adults were assigned to groups trained to increase frontal theta, parietal high alpha, or random frequencies (active control group). We measured resting-state EEG, working memory performance, and self-reported psychological states before and after one neurofeedback session. Although our analyses revealed improvements in electrophysiological and behavioral outcomes, these gains were not specific to the experimental groups. An increase in the frequency targeted by the training has been observed for the theta and high alpha groups, but training designed to increase randomly selected frequencies appears to induce more generalized neuromodulation compared with targeting a specific frequency. Among all the predictors of neuromodulation examined, resting theta and high alpha amplitudes predicted specifically the increase of those frequencies during the training. These results highlight the challenge of integrating a control group based on enhancing randomly selected frequency bands and suggest potential avenues for optimizing interventions (e.g., by including a control group trained in both up- and down-regulation).
Keywords: Active control group; High alpha; Neurofeedback; Theta; Working memory.
© 2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Improving episodic memory: Frontal-midline theta neurofeedback training increases source memory performance.Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 15;222:117219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117219. Epub 2020 Aug 1. Neuroimage. 2020. PMID: 32750499
-
Improving cognitive control: Is theta neurofeedback training associated with proactive rather than reactive control enhancement?Psychophysiology. 2022 May;59(5):e13873. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13873. Epub 2021 Jul 6. Psychophysiology. 2022. PMID: 34231223
-
Cognitive training, but not EEG-neurofeedback, improves working memory in healthy volunteers.Brain Commun. 2023 Mar 30;5(2):fcad101. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad101. eCollection 2023. Brain Commun. 2023. PMID: 37038500 Free PMC article.
-
[Efficacy of frequency-neurofeedback and Cogmed JM-working memory training in children with ADHD].Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2015;57(7):508-16. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2015. PMID: 26189419 Review. Dutch.
-
Targeting Frontal Gamma Activity with Neurofeedback to Improve Working Memory in Schizophrenia.Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023;63:153-172. doi: 10.1007/7854_2022_377. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 35989397 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative effectiveness of electroencephalogram-neurofeedback training of 3-45 frequency band on memory in healthy population: a network meta-analysis with systematic literature search.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Apr 24;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01634-8. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 40275307 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aliño, M., Gadea, M., & Espert, R. (2016). A critical view of neurofeedback experimental designs: Sham and control as necessary conditions. International Journal of Neurology and Neurotherapy, 3(41), 10-23937. https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3001/3/1/1041
-
- Alkoby, O., Abu-Rmileh, A., Shriki, O., & Todder, D. (2018). Can we predict who will respond to neurofeedback? A review of the inefficacy problem and existing predictors for successful EEG neurofeedback learning. Neuroscience, 378, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.050 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Asai, T., Hamamoto, T., Kashihara, S., & Imamizu, H. (2022). Real-time detection and feedback of canonical electroencephalogram microstates: Validating a neurofeedback system as a function of delay. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 16, 786200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2022.786200 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Başar, E., Başar-Eroglu, C., Karakaş, S., & Schürmann, M. (2001). Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 39(2–3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00145-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bassett, D. S., & Khambhati, A. N. (2017). A network engineering perspective on probing and perturbing cognition with neurofeedback. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13338 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources