Shared decision-making with older people on TReatment Escalation planning for Acute deterioration in the emergency Medical Setting: a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives (STREAMS-C)
- PMID: 39323400
- PMCID: PMC11424886
- DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae204
Shared decision-making with older people on TReatment Escalation planning for Acute deterioration in the emergency Medical Setting: a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives (STREAMS-C)
Abstract
Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly expected in healthcare systems prioritising patient autonomy. Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) outline contingency for medical intervention in the event of patient deterioration. This study aimed to understand clinicians' perspectives on SDM in TEP for older patients in the acute medical setting.
Methods: This was a qualitative study following a constructivist approach. Semistructured interviews with vignettes were conducted with 26 consultant and registrar doctors working in emergency medicine, general internal medicine, intensive care medicine and palliative care medicine. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed.
Results: There were three themes: 'An unequal partnership', 'Options without equipoise' and 'Decisions with shared understanding'. Clinicians' expertise in synthesising complex, uncertain clinical information was contrasted with perceived patient unfamiliarity with future health planning and medical intervention. There was a strong sense of morality underpinning decision-making and little equipoise about appropriate TEP decisions. Communication around the TEP was important, and clinicians sought control over the high-stakes decision whilst avoiding conflict and achieving shared understanding.
Conclusions: Clinicians take responsibility for securing a 'good' TEP decision for older patients in the acute medical setting. They synthesise clinical data with implicit ethical reasoning according to their professional predictions of qualitative and quantitative success following medical intervention. SDM is seldom considered a priority for this context. Nonetheless, avoidance of conflict, preserving the clinical relationship and shared understanding with the patient and family are important.
Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; doctor–patient relationship; older people; qualitative research; shared decision-making; treatment escalation planning.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Perspectives of healthcare professionals and older patients on shared decision-making for treatment escalation planning in the acute hospital setting: a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis.EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 10;62:102144. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102144. eCollection 2023 Aug. EClinicalMedicine. 2023. PMID: 37588625 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision making with older people on treatment escalation planning for acute deterioration in the emergency medical setting: a UK-based qualitative study of patient perspectives (STREAMS-P).Lancet Healthy Longev. 2025 Mar;6(3):100689. doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100689. Epub 2025 Mar 6. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2025. PMID: 40058387
-
Unravelling clinicians' shared decision-making adoption: a qualitative exploration through the lens of diffusion of innovations theory.BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 21;14(6):e080765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080765. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38908847 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care.Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Apr 16;2(2):84-87. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000081. eCollection 2017 Jun. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28959495 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine.Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113900. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113900. Epub 2021 Apr 3. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 33838448 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision making a reality: No decision about me, without me The King’s Fund. 2011.
-
- General Medical Council . Decision making and consent, https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/dec... (2020, accessed 18/2/2023).
-
- Royal College of Physicians . Conversations for ethically complex care: A framework to support discussion and documentation of decision making for levels of care in clinical practice. 2021.
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Shared decision making (NG197), www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197 (2021, accessed 28/02/2023). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources