Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 1;53(9):afae204.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae204.

Shared decision-making with older people on TReatment Escalation planning for Acute deterioration in the emergency Medical Setting: a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives (STREAMS-C)

Bronwen E Warner  1 , Mary Wells  2   3 , Cecilia Vindrola-Padros  4 , Stephen J Brett  1   5
Affiliations

Shared decision-making with older people on TReatment Escalation planning for Acute deterioration in the emergency Medical Setting: a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives (STREAMS-C)

Bronwen E Warner et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly expected in healthcare systems prioritising patient autonomy. Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) outline contingency for medical intervention in the event of patient deterioration. This study aimed to understand clinicians' perspectives on SDM in TEP for older patients in the acute medical setting.

Methods: This was a qualitative study following a constructivist approach. Semistructured interviews with vignettes were conducted with 26 consultant and registrar doctors working in emergency medicine, general internal medicine, intensive care medicine and palliative care medicine. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed.

Results: There were three themes: 'An unequal partnership', 'Options without equipoise' and 'Decisions with shared understanding'. Clinicians' expertise in synthesising complex, uncertain clinical information was contrasted with perceived patient unfamiliarity with future health planning and medical intervention. There was a strong sense of morality underpinning decision-making and little equipoise about appropriate TEP decisions. Communication around the TEP was important, and clinicians sought control over the high-stakes decision whilst avoiding conflict and achieving shared understanding.

Conclusions: Clinicians take responsibility for securing a 'good' TEP decision for older patients in the acute medical setting. They synthesise clinical data with implicit ethical reasoning according to their professional predictions of qualitative and quantitative success following medical intervention. SDM is seldom considered a priority for this context. Nonetheless, avoidance of conflict, preserving the clinical relationship and shared understanding with the patient and family are important.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; doctor–patient relationship; older people; qualitative research; shared decision-making; treatment escalation planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

    1. Warner BE, Lound A, Grailey Ket al. Perspectives of healthcare professionals and older patients on shared decision-making for treatment escalation planning in the acute hospital setting: A systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis EClinicalMedicine. 2023;62:62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision making a reality: No decision about me, without me The King’s Fund. 2011.
    1. General Medical Council . Decision making and consent, https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/dec... (2020, accessed 18/2/2023).
    1. Royal College of Physicians . Conversations for ethically complex care: A framework to support discussion and documentation of decision making for levels of care in clinical practice. 2021.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Shared decision making (NG197), www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197 (2021, accessed 28/02/2023). - PubMed