Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;17(5):e004512.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.123.004512. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

Polygenic Scoring for Detection of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Dilation

Affiliations

Polygenic Scoring for Detection of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Dilation

John DePaolo et al. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Ascending thoracic aortic dilation is a complex heritable trait that involves modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. Polygenic scores (PGS) are increasingly used to assess risk for complex diseases. The degree to which a PGS can improve aortic diameter prediction in diverse populations is unknown. Presently, we tested whether adding a PGS to clinical prediction algorithms improves performance in a diverse biobank.

Methods: The analytic cohort comprised 6235 Penn Medicine Biobank participants with available echocardiography and clinical data linked to genome-wide genotype data. Linear regression models were used to integrate PGS weights derived from a genome-wide association study of thoracic aortic diameter performed in the UK Biobank and were compared with the performance of the previously published aorta optimized regression for thoracic aneurysm (AORTA) score.

Results: Cohort participants had a median age of 61 years (IQR, 53-70) and a mean ascending aortic diameter of 3.36 cm (SD, 0.49). Fifty-five percent were male, and 33% were genetically similar to an African reference population. Compared with the AORTA score, which explained 30.6% (95% CI, 29.9%-31.4%) of the variance in aortic diameter, AORTA score+UK Biobank-derived PGS explained 33.1%, (95% CI, 32.3%-33.8%), the reweighted AORTA score explained 32.5% (95% CI, 31.8%-33.2%), and the reweighted AORTA score+UK Biobank-derived PGS explained 34.9% (95% CI, 34.2%-35.6%). When stratified by population, models including the UK Biobank-derived PGS consistently improved upon the clinical AORTA score among individuals genetically similar to a European reference population but conferred minimal improvement among individuals genetically similar to an African reference population. Comparable performance disparities were observed in models developed to discriminate cases/noncases of thoracic aortic dilation (≥4.0 cm).

Conclusions: We demonstrated that inclusion of a UK Biobank-derived PGS to the AORTA score confers a clinically meaningful improvement in model performance only among individuals genetically similar to European reference populations and may exacerbate existing health care disparities.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis; aortic dilation; polygenic risk score; statistical models; thoracic aorta.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Levin receives research support to his institution from MyOme outside of this work. Dr Damrauer receives research support to his institution from RenalytixAI and in kind support from Novo Nordisk, both outside of this work. Dr Damrauer is named as a co-inventor on a government-owned US Patent application related to the use of genetic risk prediction for venous thromboembolic disease filed by the US Department of Veterans Affairs in accordance with Federal regulatory requirements.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Takeuchi S, Yamaguchi Y, Soejima K, Yoshino H. Incidence and characteristics of acute aortic dissection in patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest evaluated by non-contrast computed tomography. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020;9:S48–S57. doi: 10.1177/2048872620923647 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howard DP, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Perkins J, Silver LE, Rothwell PM, Oxford Vascular S. Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control: 10-year results from the Oxford Vascular Study. Circulation. 2013;127:2031–2037. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000483 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landenhed M, Engstrom G, Gottsater A, Caulfield MP, Hedblad B, Newton-Cheh C, Melander O, Smith JG. Risk profiles for aortic dissection and ruptured or surgically treated aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e001513. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001513 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melvinsdottir IH, Lund SH, Agnarsson BA, Sigvaldason K, Gudbjartsson T, Geirsson A. The incidence and mortality of acute thoracic aortic dissection: results from a whole nation study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw235 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trimarchi S, Nienaber CA, Rampoldi V, Myrmel T, Suzuki T, Mehta RH, Bossone E, Cooper JV, Smith DE, Menicanti L, et al. Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.005 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources