Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 26:13:e59900.
doi: 10.2196/59900.

The Impact of Digital Technology on the Physical Health of Older Workers: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Jeroen J A Spijker  1 , Hande Barlın  2 , Diana Alecsandra Grad  3 , Yang Gu  4 , Aija Klavina  5   6 , Nilufer Korkmaz Yaylagul  7 , Gunilla Kulla  8 , Eda Orhun  9 , Anna Ševčíková  10 , Brigid Unim  11 , Cristina Maria Tofan  12   13
Affiliations

The Impact of Digital Technology on the Physical Health of Older Workers: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Jeroen J A Spijker et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Digital technologies have penetrated most workplaces. However, it is unclear how such digital technologies affect the physical health of older workers.

Objective: This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the evidence from scientific literature concerning the impact of digital technology on the physical health of older workers.

Methods: This scoping review will be conducted following recommendations outlined by Levac et al and will adhere to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for reporting. Peer-reviewed papers written in English will be searched in the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and ERIH PLUS. The web-based systematic review platform Covidence will be used to create a data extraction template. It will cover the following items: study and participant characteristics, health measures, digital tool characteristics and usage, and research findings. Following the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework, our review will focus on studies involving older workers aged 50 years or older, any form of digital technology (including teleworking and the use of digital tools at work), and how digital technologies affect physical health (such as vision loss, musculoskeletal disorders, and migraines). Studies that focus only on mental health will be excluded. Study selection based on title and abstract screening (first stage), full-text review (second stage), and data extraction (third stage) will be performed by a group of researchers, whereby each paper will be reviewed by at least 2 people. Any conflict regarding the inclusion or exclusion of a study and the data extraction will be resolved by discussion between the researchers who evaluated the papers; a third researcher will be involved if consensus is not reached.

Results: A preliminary search of MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Cochrane, PROSPERO, and JBI Evidence Synthesis was conducted, and no current or ongoing systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. The results of the study are expected in April 2025.

Conclusions: Our scoping review will seek to provide an overview of the available evidence and identify research gaps regarding the effect of digital technology and the use of digital tools in the work environment on the physical health of older workers.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/59900.

Keywords: aging; digital technology; digital tools; digitalization; migraine; mobile phone; mobility; musculoskeletal disorders; older population; older workers; physical health; scoping review; vision loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Tosh G, Clifton AV, Xia J, White MM. Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(1):CD008298. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008298.pub3. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24442580 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koipysheva EA, Lebedinsky VY, Koipysheva M. Physical health (definition, semantic content, study prospects) Eur Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2018;50:1–1464. https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.73 - DOI
    1. Poscia A, Moscato U, La Milia DI, Milovanovic S, Stojanovic J, Borghini A, Collamati A, Ricciardi W, Magnavita N. Workplace health promotion for older workers: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1518-z. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1... 10.1186/s12913-016-1518-z - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maertens JA, Putter SE, Chen PY, Diehl M, Huang Y-HE, Hedge J. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. Physical Capabilities and Occupational Health of Older Workers; pp. 215–235.
    1. Phillip JM, Aifuwa I, Walston J, Wirtz D. The mechanobiology of aging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2015;17:113–141. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040829. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26643020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources