Enhancing quality of life measurement: adapting the ASCOT easy read for older adults accessing social care
- PMID: 39327344
- PMCID: PMC11802674
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03791-0
Enhancing quality of life measurement: adapting the ASCOT easy read for older adults accessing social care
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to adapt and assess the content validity of the ASCOT Easy Read (ASCOT-ER) for older people accessing social care.
Methods: A co-production working group of 8 older social care users and their supporters was established to evaluate the comprehensibility and relevance of the ASCOT-ER images, wording and layout. Changes made by the working group were iteratively tested using cognitive interviewing techniques (think aloud) with 25 older social care users not able to self-complete the original ASCOT.
Results: Co-research with people with dementia and their supporters was critical to the development of an effective and accessible tool. Issues identified with comprehension, recall, judgement and response were addressed through iterative adjustments to design, layout and wording. An unexpected finding was that illustrations were disliked or disregarded by the majority of people, and, in particular, those living with dementia. This result contrasts with the typical assumption of easy read approaches, where illustrations are expected to enhance comprehension.
Conclusion: The ASCOT-ER measure for older people is suitable for older people using social care services with mild to moderate dementia, mild cognitive impairment and other age-related needs. The revisions applied were designed to improve comprehension, judgement and response for this group and even those who were most cognitively impaired experienced fewer issues by the final round of testing. Nonetheless, some prompting was still required, particularly for those with higher levels of cognitive impairment and it is likely that some respondents will require the questionnaire to be administered in an interview format.
Keywords: Co-production; Dementia; Easy read; Older adults; Quality of life; Social care.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial interests to declare. Non-financial interests: AMT, SER and JC are members of the ASCOT advisory team ( www.pssru.ac.uk/ascot ). Ethics approval: Approval was granted by the Coventry and Warwick Research Ethics Committee, The Old Chapel, Royal Standard Place, Nottingham (14th December 2022, Reference 22/WM/0234). Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Developing a proxy version of the Adult social care outcome toolkit (ASCOT).Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 19;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0682-0. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28526055 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility, validity and reliability of the ASCOT-Proxy and ASCOT-Carer among unpaid carers of people living with dementia in England.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jun 3;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02122-0. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023. PMID: 37270560 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding how users of home-based aged care services with cognitive impairment rate their social care related quality of life.BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 4;25(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05613-x. BMC Geriatr. 2025. PMID: 39755588 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive interviewing for assessing the content validity of older-person specific outcome measures for quality assessment and economic evaluation: a scoping review.Qual Life Res. 2025 Mar;34(3):605-619. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03849-z. Epub 2024 Dec 3. Qual Life Res. 2025. PMID: 39625627
-
Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03958-3. Online ahead of print. Qual Life Res. 2025. PMID: 40251460 Review.
References
-
- NHS England. Adult Social Care Activity and Finance Report, England, 2022-23 [Internet]. London (2023). https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/adu...
-
- Rand, S., Malley, J., Towers, A. M., Netten, A., & Forder, J. (2017). Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Netten, A., Burge, P., Malley, J., Potoglou, D., Towers, A. M. M., Brazier, J., Flynn, T., & Forder, J. (2012). Outcomes of social care for adults: Developing a preference-weighted measure. Health Technology Assessessment (Rockv),16, 1–165. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical